Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992;19(1):30-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00178305.

Estimation of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid plasma clearance: a comparative assessment of simplified techniques

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Estimation of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid plasma clearance: a comparative assessment of simplified techniques

G Picciotto et al. Eur J Nucl Med. 1992.

Abstract

Chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) total plasma clearance was evaluated using a multi-sample method (i.e. 12 blood samples) as the reference compared with several simplified methods which necessitated only one or few blood samples. The following 5 methods were evaluated: terminal slope-intercept method with 3 blood samples, simplified method of Bröchner-Mortensen and 3 single-sample methods (Constable, Christensen and Groth, Tauxe). Linear regression analysis was performed. Standard error of estimate, bias and imprecision of different methods were evaluated. For 51Cr-EDTA total plasma clearance greater than 30 ml.min-1, the results which most approximated the reference source were obtained by the Christensen and Groth method at a sampling time of 300 min (inaccuracy of 4.9%). For clearances between 10 and 30 ml.min-1, single-sample methods failed to give reliable results. Terminal slope-intercept and Bröchner-Mortensen methods were better, with inaccuracies of 17.7% and 16.9%, respectively. Although sampling times at 180, 240 and 300 min are time-consuming for patients, 51Cr-EDTA total plasma clearance can be accurately calculated for values greater than 10 ml.min-1 using the Bröchner-Mortensen method. In patients with clearance greater than 30 ml.min-1, single-sample techniques provide a good alternative to the multi-sample method; the choice of the method to be used depends on the degree of accuracy required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Br J Urol. 1979 Apr;51(2):84-7 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1972 Nov;30(3):271-4 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1976 May;36(3):247-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Physiol. 1981 Aug;1(4):417-25 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1975 Jun 7;2(5970):542 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources