Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988
- PMID: 1547898
Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988
Abstract
Although research on reproductive behavior depends heavily on information from surveys, abortions are characteristically underreported in such data. Estimates of the level of reporting are made for each of the recent major surveys of U.S. women: the 1976, 1982, and 1988 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth, the 1976 and 1979 National Surveys of Young Women, and the National Longitudinal Surveys of Work Experience of Youth. The estimates are based on comparisons with external counts of abortions taking place. We examine variation by characteristics of women, trends over time, and the possible effects of length of recall and of the way in which questions about abortion are asked. Abortion reporting is found to be highly deficient in all the surveys, although the level varies widely. Whites are more likely to report their abortions than nonwhites. Special, confidential questioning procedures hold promise for improving the results.
Similar articles
-
Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):128-33, 138. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9635261
-
Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries.Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Jan-Feb;32(1):14-23. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000. PMID: 10710702
-
Abortion surveillance--United States, 1998.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Jun 7;51(3):1-32. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002. PMID: 12369584
-
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
-
Induced abortion in Italy: levels, trends and characteristics.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):267-71, 277. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8959417 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing public awareness and use of medical abortion via mobile phone survey in India.Contraception. 2019 Dec;100(6):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 28. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 31472114 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of family planning policies: the abortion paradox.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e91539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091539. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24670784 Free PMC article.
-
Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 19;11(11):e047570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047570. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34799361 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025. PMID: 40416941
-
Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):259-278. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12068. Epub 2018 Jul 24. Stud Fam Plann. 2018. PMID: 30040126 Free PMC article.