Similar articles

• Side-by-side reading of PET and CT scans in oncology: which patients might profit from integrated PET/CT?

  Reinartz P, Wieres FJ, Schneider W, Schur A, Buell U. Reinartz P, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Nov;31(11):1456-61. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1593-y. Epub 2004 Jul 10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004. PMID: 15248033 Clinical Trial.
• CT in PET/CT: essential features of interpretation.

  Schöder H, Yeung HW, Larson SM. Schöder H, et al. J Nucl Med. 2005 Aug;46(8):1249-51. J Nucl Med. 2005. PMID: 16085577 No abstract available.
• Software fusion: an option never fully explored.

  Bridges RL. Bridges RL. J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50(5):834-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055574. Epub 2009 Apr 16. J Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19372489 No abstract available.
• Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function.

  Townsend DW. Townsend DW. J Nucl Med. 2008 Jun;49(6):938-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051276. Epub 2008 May 15. J Nucl Med. 2008. PMID: 18483101 Review.
• Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the joint working group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.

  Coleman RE, Delbeke D, Guiberteau MJ, Conti PS, Royal HD, Weinreb JC, Siegel BA, Federle MF, Townsend DW, Berland LL; American College of Radiology; Society of Nuclear Medicine; Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance. Coleman RE, et al. J Nucl Med. 2005 Jul;46(7):1225-39. J Nucl Med. 2005. PMID: 16000293 Review.