Incidence of and risk factors for bundle branch block in adults older than 40 years
- PMID: 15481609
- PMCID: PMC4531556
- DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2004.19.3.171
Incidence of and risk factors for bundle branch block in adults older than 40 years
Abstract
Background: In the general population, the incidence of bundle branch block (BBB) is relatively low, and its effects on long-term prognosis have not been established. Previous studies on the incidence and correlation of BBB to clinical factors have produced conflicting results. However, the incidence of BBB was strongly related to age. This study aimed to describe the incidence of and risk factors for BBB in Korea.
Methods: In this study, 14,540 adults (male 6,573/female 7,967) > or = 40 years old received screening tests for general health between April and December 2000. Participants answered questionnaires and underwent examinations, which included blood pressure, electrocardiogram (ECG), total cholesterol and fasting glucose. The data analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 for windows.
Results: The incidences of complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) were 1.5 and 2.9% in people older than 40 and 65 years, respectively. Approximately 38.0% of individuals with CRBBB were older than 65 years. The incidence of CRBBB was higher in men than women at all age groups was highest in those aged 75-79 years. Males, advancing age (> or = 65 years), hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) were associated with an increased risk of CRBBB. The incidences of complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) and bifascicular bundle branch block (BBBB) were 0.1 and 0.08% and 0.3 and 0.2% in those older than 40 and 65 years, respectively. Approximately 71.4 and 58.3% of individuals with LBBB and BBBB, respectively, were older than 65 years. Advancing age and cardiac disease were associated with an increased risk of LBBB. Advancing age was associated with an increased risk of BBBB. The most potent risk factor for BBB in this study was advancing age.
Conclusion: The incidences of BBB were 1.7 and 3.4% in those older than 40 and 65 years respectively. Bundle branch block correlates strongly with age, and is common in the older ages groups. These findings support the theory that bundle branch block is a marker of slowly progressing degenerative diseases.
Similar articles
-
Right bundle branch block: Prevalence, incidence, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population.Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;25(3):109-115. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1639667. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019. PMID: 31339387 Free PMC article.
-
Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913.Circulation. 1998 Dec 1;98(22):2494-500. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.22.2494. Circulation. 1998. PMID: 9832497
-
Prevalence and long-term prognosis of patients with complete bundle branch block (right or left bundle branch) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction referred for stress echocardiography.Echocardiography. 2015 Mar;32(3):483-9. doi: 10.1111/echo.12680. Epub 2014 Jul 5. Echocardiography. 2015. PMID: 25039375
-
Cardiac pacing in left bundle branch/bifascicular block patients.Ann Card Anaesth. 2010 Jan-Apr;13(1):7-15. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.58828. Ann Card Anaesth. 2010. PMID: 20075529 Review.
-
Diabetes as a risk factor for cardiac conduction defects: a review.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007 May;9(3):276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00609.x. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007. PMID: 17391152 Review.
Cited by
-
Right bundle branch block: Prevalence, incidence, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population.Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;25(3):109-115. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1639667. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019. PMID: 31339387 Free PMC article.
-
Age and gender differences of basic electrocardiographic values and abnormalities in the general adult population; Tehran Cohort Study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03339-z. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023. PMID: 37328821 Free PMC article.
-
Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT asynchrony measurements in patients with left bundle branch block.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan;25(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10554-008-9354-9. Epub 2008 Aug 10. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. PMID: 18695994 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and prognosis of cardiac conduction system diseases in hypertension: the STEP trial.Nat Aging. 2024 Apr;4(4):483-490. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00591-6. Epub 2024 Mar 21. Nat Aging. 2024. PMID: 38514823 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevalences and associated factors of electrocardiographic abnormalities in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01698-5. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020. PMID: 32917144 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, McCabe N, Pye C, Walsh MJ, Robinson K. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1185–1190. - PubMed
-
- Hardarson T, Arnarson A, Eliasson GJ, Palsson K, Eyjolfsson K, Sigfusson N. Left bundle branch block: prevalence, incidence, follow-up and outcome. Eur Heart J. 1987;8:1075–1079. - PubMed
-
- Thrainsdottir IS, Hardarson T, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. The epidemiology of right bundle branch block and its association with cardiovascular morbidity: the Reykjavik Study. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1590–1596. - PubMed
-
- Ostrander LD, Jr, Brandt RL, Kjelsberg MO, Epstein FH. Electrocardiographic findings among the adult population of a total natural community, Tecumseh, Michigan. Circulation. 1965;31:888–898. - PubMed
-
- Kreger BE, Anderson KM, Kannel WB. Prevalence of intraventricular block in the general population. Am Heart J. 1989;117:903–910. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous