Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders
- PMID: 15482555
- PMCID: PMC1492580
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40016.x
Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders
Abstract
Objective: Functional measures have a great appeal for prognostic instruments because they are associated with mortality, they represent the end-impact of disease on the patient, and information about them can be obtained directly from the patient. However, there are no prognostic indices that have been developed for community-dwelling elders based primarily on functional measures. Our objective in this study was to develop and validate a prognostic index for 2-year mortality in community-dwelling elders, based on self-reported functional status, age, and gender.
Design: Population-based cohort study from 1993 to 1995.
Setting: Community-dwelling elders within the United States.
Participants: Subjects, age > or =70 (N = 7,393), from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study. We developed the index in 4,516 participants (mean age 78, 84% white, 61% female), and validated it in 2,877 different participants (mean age 78, 73% white, 61% female).
Main outcome measures: Prediction of 2-year mortality using risk factors such as activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, additional measures of physical function, age, and gender.
Results: Overall mortality was 10% in the development cohort and 12% in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 6 independent predictors of mortality were identified and weighted, using logistic regression models, to create a point scale: male gender, 2 points; age (76 to 80, 1 point; >80, 2 points); dependence in bathing, 1 point; dependence in shopping, 2 points; difficulty walking several blocks, 2 points; and difficulty pulling or pushing heavy objects, 1 point. We calculated risk scores for each patient by adding the points of each independent risk factor present. In the development cohort, 2-year mortality was 3% in the lowest risk group (0 to 2 points), 11% in the middle risk group (3 to 6 points), and 34% in the highest risk group (>7 points). In the validation cohort, 2-year mortality was 5% in the lowest risk group, 12% in the middle risk group, and 36% in the highest risk group. The c-statistics for the point system were 0.76 and 0.74 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively.
Conclusions: This prognostic index, which relies solely on self-reported functional status, age, and gender, provides a simple and accurate method of stratifying community-dwelling elders into groups at varying risk of mortality.
Figures
Comment in
-
Death and primary care.J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Oct;19(10):1066-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40701.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15482562 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Older homeless adults: can we do more?J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jan;27(1):5-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1925-0. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22086754 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Christakis NA. Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1999.
-
- Iezzoni LI. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: Health Administration Press; 1997.
-
- Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Demography and epidemiology. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti ME, editors. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003. pp. 53–75.
-
- Walter LC, Brand RJ, Counsell SR, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization. JAMA. 2001;285:2987–94. - PubMed
-
- Inouye SK, Peduzzi PN, Robison JT, Hughes JS, Horwitz RI, Concato J. Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1187–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources