Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Jan-Feb;7(1):11-3.
doi: 10.1007/BF02599093.

The value of sputum cytology

Affiliations

The value of sputum cytology

B MacDougall et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of cytologic examination of expectorated sputum in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected lung cancer.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Inpatient wards, tertiary care university hospital.

Measurements and main results: The charts of 357 patients were reviewed. Two hundred eighty-eight of the 357 patients had had initial sputum cytologic examination prior to other diagnostic procedures, of which 41 (15%) had positive cytologic results. Thirty-six of the 41 were confirmed histologically or shown to have metastatic spread by noninvasive tests. Of the 222 patients with negative or unsatisfactory sputum tests, 97 went on to bronchoscopy and 35 had needle-aspiration biopsies. In the population of patients whose chest x-rays were highly suggestive of primary or metastatic lung cancer, the positive rate for cytologic examination was 38/94 (40%). There was no false-positive test in this study. Of the 50 patients with positive cytologic results, five (10%) had diseases that were of a different cell type; two of these five (40%) had diseases that involved small-cell cancer. There was an unsatisfactory delay in obtaining these samples for analysis.

Conclusions: Sputum cytology was found to be too insensitive and insufficiently accurate to be included in the routine workup of a patient suspected of having lung cancer. The results of the test did not influence further diagnostic procedures. This test should, therefore, be reserved for patients considered on initial assessment to be too sick for further investigations and treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. South Med J. 1984 Jul;77(7):840-2 - PubMed
    1. Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):524-7 - PubMed
    1. Acta Cytol. 1985 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-56 - PubMed
    1. Acta Cytol. 1983 Jul-Aug;27(4):397-402 - PubMed
    1. Acta Cytol. 1980 Nov-Dec;24(6):494-500 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources