Funding collaborative juvenile crime prevention programs: does it make a difference?
- PMID: 15486158
- DOI: 10.1177/0193841X04267908
Funding collaborative juvenile crime prevention programs: does it make a difference?
Abstract
Panel data were analyzed to determine whether funding for collaborative juvenile crime prevention programs reduced arrests in California counties. Because the data were a population (i.e., all 58 counties in the state), regression results were summarized descriptively, and special attention was given to the direction and magnitude of key coefficients. Funding was associated with little to no overall reductions in arrests for felonies, misdemeanors, and status offenses. However, estimates of arrests prevented varied across each of the 14 counties that received funding.
Similar articles
-
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) funding: a nationwide assessment of effects on rape and assault.Violence Against Women. 2009 Feb;15(2):168-85. doi: 10.1177/1077801208329146. Epub 2008 Dec 15. Violence Against Women. 2009. PMID: 19075117
-
Evidence-based practices reduce juvenile recidivism: can state government effectively promote implementation among probation departments?Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Sep;48(1-2):138-40. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9416-8. Am J Community Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21264682
-
Learning disabilities, crime, delinquency, and special education placement.Adolescence. 1997 Summer;32(126):451-62. Adolescence. 1997. PMID: 9179341 Review.
-
[The significance of control for juvenile delinquency].Lakartidningen. 2001 May 16;98(20):2478-83. Lakartidningen. 2001. PMID: 11433981 Swedish. No abstract available.
-
Effectiveness of family-based programs to prevent delinquency and later offending.Psicothema. 2006 Aug;18(3):596-602. Psicothema. 2006. PMID: 17296093 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources