Similar articles

• Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

  Hydén-Granskog C, Tiitinen A. Hydén-Granskog C, et al. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004 Sep;7(3):175-82. doi: 10.1080/14647270400006929. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004. PMID: 15590571
• [Against the obligation of single embryo transfer].

  Merviel P, Lourdel E, Cabry R, Grenier N, Sanguinet P, Henry I, Brasseur F, Copin H. Merviel P, et al. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007 May;35(5):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Mar 29. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007. PMID: 17398139 French. No abstract available.
• Effect of in vitro fertilization practices on multiple pregnancy rates in Finland.

  Tiitinen A, Gissler M. Tiitinen A, et al. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1689-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.090. Fertil Steril. 2004. PMID: 15589883
• Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.

  Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL. Fiddelers AA, et al. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):5-13. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml053. Epub 2006 Nov 10. Hum Reprod Update. 2007. PMID: 17099208 Review.
• Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project.

  Ombelet W, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Martens G. Ombelet W, et al. Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):3-14. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh048. Epub 2004 Nov 4. Hum Reprod Update. 2005. PMID: 15528214 Review.