Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Oct;64(4):687-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.038.

Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein-22 as a clinical diagnostic marker for bladder cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein-22 as a clinical diagnostic marker for bladder cancer

Yih-Hsin Chang et al. Urology. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate prospectively the prognostic power of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP-22) for bladder cancer in Taiwanese screening and surveillance settings.

Methods: Single voided urine samples were obtained from 68 healthy individuals, 303 patients with benign urothelial diseases, and 28 patients with urogenital tumors. The NMP-22 levels in the urine samples were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods.

Results: The median NMP-22 level in healthy individuals and patients with benign and malignant disease was 5.9, 4.8, and 7.4 U/mL, respectively. The positive NMP-22 rate in healthy individuals and patients with benign and malignant disease was 4.4%, 17.2%, and 50%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 50%, 82.8%, 21.2%, and 94.7%, respectively, using 7.5 U/mL as the cutoff value.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that NMP-22 is not a good diagnostic tool for screening or follow-up surveillance of bladder cancer owing to its low sensitivity and positive predictive value. Nevertheless, it could be adopted as a tool to rule out the possibility or risk of developing bladder cancer because of its high negative predictive value in our study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources