Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):64-71.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1495. Epub 2004 Oct 18.

VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders

Stacie Salsbury Lyons  1 , Toni Tripp-Reimer, Bernard A Sorofman, Jane E Dewitt, Bonnie J Bootsmiller, Thomas E Vaughn, Bradley N Doebbeling
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders

Stacie Salsbury Lyons et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This multisite study compared the perceptions of three stakeholder groups regarding information technologies as barriers to and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Design: The study settings were 18 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. A purposive sample of 322 individuals participated in 50 focus groups segmented by profession and included administrators, physicians, and nurses. Focus group participants were selected based on their knowledge of practice guidelines and involvement in facility-wide guideline implementation.

Measurements: Descriptive content analysis of 1,500 pages of focus group transcripts.

Results: Eighteen themes clustered into four domains. Stakeholders were similar in discussing themes in the computer function domain most frequently but divergent in other domains, with workplace factors more often discussed by administrators, system design issues discussed most by nurses, and personal concerns discussed by physicians and nurses. Physicians and nurses most often discussed barriers, whereas administrators focused most often on facilitation. Facilitators included guideline maintenance and charting formats. Barriers included resources, attitudes, time and workload, computer glitches, computer complaints, data retrieval, and order entry. Themes with dual designations included documentation, patient records, decision support, performance evaluation, CPG implementation, computer literacy, essential data, and computer accessibility.

Conclusion: Stakeholders share many concerns regarding the relationships between information technologies and clinical guideline use. However, administrators, physicians, and nurses hold different opinions about specific facilitators and barriers. Health professionals' disparate perceptions could undermine guideline initiatives. Implementation plans should specifically incorporate actions to address these barriers and enhance the facilitative aspects of information technologies in clinical practice guideline use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Computers as facilitators of clinical practice guidelines.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Computers as barriers to clinical practice guidelines.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clancy C, Scully T. A call to excellence: how the federal government's health agencies are responding to the call for improved patient safety and accountability in medicine. Health Affairs. 2003;22:113–5. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. The Computer-based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
    1. Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. Making Health Care Safe: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, 2001.

Publication types