[Evaluation of quality and accessibility of health education materials. II. The opinion of patients]
- PMID: 15493344
[Evaluation of quality and accessibility of health education materials. II. The opinion of patients]
Abstract
The study on quality and accessibility of educational materials for patients was taken up in Health Promotion Department of the National Institute of Hygiene and the Mazovian Centre of Public Health in 2003. The questionnaire contained demographic information (gender, age, civil state, residence, employment and level of education), and questions about patients' opinions concerning the sources of health information (usefulness for knowledge enlargement, use in everyday life and perceived truth). The data were obtained from 110 patients living in Warsaw, who waited for visit in dispensaries or had treated in hospitals. The patients pointed television (54.5% of respondents), members of family (50.9%), physician or nurse in the course of consultations (48.2%), journals (46.4%) and friends (43.6%) as the sources, which most frequently provided health information. Women significantly more frequently than men acquired health information from journals (respectively: 53.8% and 26.7%), while men more frequently than women received health information from physicians or nurses in course of visits (respectively: 66.7% and 41.3%). As regards to age, the younger patients significantly more frequently acquired health information from family (younger group--61.2%, medium group--37.9%, elder group - 28,2%), friends (respectively: 55.2%, 27.2%, 21.4%) and from educational materials exposed in specific dispensaries (respectively: 44.8%, 17.2%, 14.3%). The elder patients more frequently received health information from physicians or nurses in course of consultations (elder group--85.7%, medium group--62.1%, younger group--34.3%). In comparison with other sources, the highest percentage of respondents assessed health information received from physician or nurse as very useful for enlargement their knowledge, use in their everyday life and very true, however, this percentage is low (respectively: 29.0%, 25.7% and 46.7%). Our findings confirm the need to elaborate health education materials more adequate to patients' expectations.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of quality and accessibility of health education materials. I. The opinion of health personnel].Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2004;55(2):115-23. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2004. PMID: 15493343 Polish.
-
[Evaluation of medical service quality by hospitalized patients].Przegl Epidemiol. 2008;62(3):643-50. Przegl Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 19108529 Polish.
-
[Evaluation of patients' satisfaction level as a part of the quality of primary health care functioning].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Nov;23(137):367-70. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007. PMID: 18361322 Polish.
-
Strategies to improve cancer education materials.Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Sep;23(8):1305-12. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996. PMID: 8883075 Review.
-
Promoting family planning: findings from operations research and program research.Prog Clin Biol Res. 1991;371:97-142. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1991. PMID: 1956907 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Community education and health promotion activities of naturopathic practitioners: results of an international cross-sectional survey.BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03467-z. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021. PMID: 34847899 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials