Long-term safety and tolerability of continuous-combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: results from a seven-year randomised comparison of low and standard doses
- PMID: 15494100
- DOI: 10.1258/1362180043654647
Long-term safety and tolerability of continuous-combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: results from a seven-year randomised comparison of low and standard doses
Erratum in
- J Br Menopause Soc. 2004 Dec;10(4):168
Abstract
Objective: To establish the long-term safety profile of four oestradiol valerate/medroxyprogesterone acetate (E(2)V/MPA) regimens.
Study design: 419 postmenopausal women in parallel treatment groups started treatment with 1 or 2 mg E(2)V with either 2.5 or 5 mg MPA for 84 cycles of 28 days in a randomised, comparative study. The first 24 month double-blind efficacy period has been previously reported. This report focuses on the open safety period after the first two years until completion of 84 treatment cycles.
Results: A total of 275 women (65.6%) completed the seven-year study. All regimens provided good bleeding control and endometrial protection, with no cases of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer diagnosed. All regimens were well tolerated with a low frequency of adverse effects, mostly occurring within the first two years. The most common drug-related adverse events included breakthrough bleeding, headache/migraine, abdominal pain and mood changes. Very few women (n = 4) receiving the lowest dose option (1 mg E(2)V + 2.5 mg MPA) reported adverse effects (p<0.009 vs other groups). No serious cardiovascular events occurred in any of the groups, the incidence of strokes was lower than the national incidence for the age group and the incidence of breast cancer was comparable with the national incidence (95% CI). In the lowest dose group, no women had to stop therapy prematurely due to serious adverse events.
Conclusions: The results support the use of lower doses for longterm hormone therapies.
Similar articles
-
A low-dose start in hormone replacement therapy provides a beneficial bleeding profile and few side-effects: randomized comparison with a conventional-dose regimen.Climacteric. 2004 Mar;7(1):59-69. doi: 10.1080/13697130310001651481. Climacteric. 2004. PMID: 15259284 Clinical Trial.
-
Effective bleeding control and symptom relief by lower dose regimens of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: a randomized comparative dose-ranging study.Maturitas. 2001 Dec 14;40(3):259-71. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00245-6. Maturitas. 2001. PMID: 11731187 Clinical Trial.
-
Endometrial safety and tolerability of triphasic sequential hormone replacement estradiol valerate/medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy regimen.Climacteric. 2004 Mar;7(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/13697130310001651445. Climacteric. 2004. PMID: 15259280 Clinical Trial.
-
Estradiol and norgestimate: a review of their combined use as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.Drugs Aging. 2001;18(11):863-85. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118110-00007. Drugs Aging. 2001. PMID: 11772126 Review.
-
Spotlight on estradiol and norgestimate as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.Treat Endocrinol. 2002;1(2):127-9. doi: 10.2165/00024677-200201020-00006. Treat Endocrinol. 2002. PMID: 15765628 Review.
Cited by
-
Menopausal hormone therapy: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness evaluations.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 5;17(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2227-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28476121 Free PMC article.
-
Practical considerations for the treatment of elderly patients with migraine.Drugs Aging. 2006;23(6):461-89. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623060-00003. Drugs Aging. 2006. PMID: 16872231 Review.
-
Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000402.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22895916 Free PMC article.