Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors
- PMID: 1549433
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03212239
Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors
Abstract
When the task is to categorize a target letter at a known location, subjects show more interference from incongruent distractors that are relatively close (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) or that share common motion with the target (Driver & Baylis, 1989). In eight experiments, we examined whether static factors other than proximity can affect the amount of interference. When distractors and the target letter were in the same color, the distractors interfered more than they did when they were in a different color, even when the latter were closer to the target. Good continuation between the target and distractors also led to more interference. These results suggest that the efficiency of selection is determined by several aspects of the relation between targets and distractors in addition to their proximity, and thus that visual attention is not directed on the basis of position information alone.
Similar articles
-
Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Percept Psychophys. 1991 Sep;50(3):267-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03206750. Percept Psychophys. 1991. PMID: 1754368
-
Movement and focused attention: a failure to replicate.Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):537-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03207537. Percept Psychophys. 1991. PMID: 1780201
-
Does motion-induced grouping modulate the flanker compatibility effect?: A failure to replicate Driver & Baylis.Can J Exp Psychol. 1993 Dec;47(4):714-29. doi: 10.1037/h0078867. Can J Exp Psychol. 1993. PMID: 8124293
-
Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition.Percept Psychophys. 2002 Apr;64(3):493-503. doi: 10.3758/bf03194720. Percept Psychophys. 2002. PMID: 12049288
-
When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):59-72. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.59. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006. PMID: 16478326
Cited by
-
Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood.Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):166-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03194045. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007. PMID: 17546748
-
Preattentive auditory context effects.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):57-77. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.57. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 12822599 Clinical Trial.
-
Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1656-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5. Epub 2018 May 29. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 29845437
-
Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception.J Vis. 2009 Feb 9;9(2):8.1-12. doi: 10.1167/9.2.8. J Vis. 2009. PMID: 19271918 Free PMC article.
-
Changing priority maps in 12- to 18-month-olds: an emerging role for object properties.Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):22-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.22. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010. PMID: 20081156 Free PMC article.