Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Oct;92(4):407-11.

Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use

Taneya Y Koonce  1 , Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse, Pauline Todd
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use

Taneya Y Koonce et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based medicine (EBM) resources in providing evidence for complex clinical questions versus general care management questions to identify situations for their optimal use.

Methods: In this investigation, forty complex clinical questions were randomly selected from an in-house archival database of questions received by librarians during clinical rounds. An additional forty questions were selected from a list of general care management questions received by the library from Pathways teams. To measure the effectiveness of resources in answering the questions, a team of librarians was asked to search UpToDate, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and HealthGate Clinical Guidelines (formerly, EBM Solutions). The team then established consensus on whether a question was fully or partially answered by one of the above-mentioned EBM resources and was instructed to record the instances in which the primary literature needed to be used to answer the question completely.

Results: The study found that the EBM resources completely answered 20.0% of the 40 complex clinical questions and 47.5% of the 40 general care management questions, partially answered 40.0% of the complex clinical questions and 22.5% of the general care management questions, and did not answer 40.0% of the complex clinical questions and 30.0% of the general care management questions.

Conclusion: The pervasive use of EBM resources in answering clinical questions is making it imperative for information specialists to develop an expertise on their appropriate use. By exploring their use in answering complex clinical questions and general care management questions, this paper underlines the strengths and weakness of EBM resources and provides information specialists with some basic knowledge about how these resources can be combined with the primary literature to strengthen their effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of evidence-based medicine (EBM) resource use in filtered packets
Figure 2
Figure 2
Questions answerable by an EBM resource
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hill GB. Archie Cochrane and his legacy. an internal challenge to physicians' autonomy? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Dec; 53(12):1189–92. - PubMed
    1. Rangachari PK. Evidence-based medicine: old French wine with a new Canadian label? J R Soc Med. 1997 May; 90(5):280–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morabia A. P.C.A. Louis and the birth of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec; 49(12):1327–33. - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenburg W, and Haynes BR. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
    1. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, and Pifer EA. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2002 Mar 23; 324(7339):710. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources