Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD000175.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000175.pub2.

Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour

G Hofmeyr, A Cyna, P Middleton
Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour

G Hofmeyr et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Reduced uterine blood flow from maternal hypotension may contribute to fetal heart rate changes which are common following regional analgesia (epidural or spinal or combined spinal-epidural (CSE)) during labour. Intravenous fluid preloading may help to reduce maternal hypotension but using lower doses of local anaesthetic, and opioid only blocks, may reduce the need for preloading.

Objectives: To assess the effects of prophylactic intravenous fluid preloading before regional analgesia during labour on maternal and fetal well-being.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (19 February 2004).

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing prophylactic intravenous preloading before regional analgesia during labour with a control group (dummy or no preloading).

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

Main results: Six studies are included (473 participants). In one epidural trial using high-dose local anaesthetic, preloading with intravenous fluids was shown to counteract the hypotension which frequently follows traditional epidural analgesia (relative risk (RR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.53; 102 women). This trial was also associated with a reduction in fetal heart rate abnormalities (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.83; 102 women); no differences were detected in other perinatal and maternal outcomes for this trial and another high-dose epidural trial. In the two epidural low-dose anaesthetic trials, no significant difference in maternal hypotension was found (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.48; 260 women), although they were underpowered to detect less than a very large effect. No significant differences were seen between groups in these trials for fetal heart rate abnormalities (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.05; 233 women). In the two CSE trials, no differences were reported between preloading and no preloading groups. In the spinal/opioid trial, the RR for hypotension was 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.83 (40 women) and 0.70, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.37 for fetal heart rate abnormalities (32 women). In the opioid only study (30 women), there were no instances of hypotension or fetal heart rate abnormalities in either group.

Reviewers' conclusions: Preloading prior to traditional high-dose local anaesthetic blocks may have some beneficial fetal and maternal effects in healthy women. Low-dose epidural and CSE analgesia techniques may reduce the need for preloading. The studies reviewed were too small to show whether preloading is beneficial for women having regional analgesia during labour using the lower-dose local anaesthetics or opioids. Further investigation of low-dose epidural or CSE (including opioid only) blocks, and the risks and benefits of intravenous preloading for women with pregnancy complications, is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural anaesthesia in labour, Outcome 1 Maternal hypotension.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural anaesthesia in labour, Outcome 3 Fetal heart rate abnormality.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural anaesthesia in labour, Outcome 4 Assisted vaginal delivery.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural anaesthesia in labour, Outcome 5 Caesarean section.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural anaesthesia in labour, Outcome 6 1 minute Apgar score < 7.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Cheek 1996 {published data only}
    1. Cheek TG, Samuels P, Miller F, Tobin M, Gutsche BB. Normal saline i.v. fluid load decreases uterine activity in active labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1996;77:632‐5. - PubMed
    1. Cheek TG, Samuels P, Tobin M, Gutsche BB. Rapid intravenous saline infusion decreases uterine activity in labor. Epidural analgesia does not. Anesthesiology 1989;71(3A):A884.
Collins 1978 {published data only}
    1. Collins KM, Bevan DR, Beard RW. Fluid loading to reduce abnormalities of fetal heart rate and maternal hypotension during epidural analgesia in labour. BMJ 1978;2:1460‐1. - PMC - PubMed
Kinsella 2000 {published data only}
    1. Kinsella SM, Pirlet M, Mills MS, Tuckey JP, Thomas TA. Randomized study of intravenous fluid preload before epidural analgesia during labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000;85(2):311‐3. - PubMed
Kubli 2003 {published data only}
    1. Kubli M, Shennan AH, Seed P, O'Sullivan G. Is fluid preloading necessary before low dose epidural in labor?. Anesthesiology 2000;92 Suppl:A7.
    1. Kubli M, Shennan AH, Seed PT, O'Sullivan G. A randomised controlled trial of fluid pre‐loading before low dose epidural analgesia for labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2003;12:256‐60. - PubMed
Macaulay 2000 {published data only}
    1. Macaulay BD, Barton MD, Norris MC, Vlastos EJ, Bottros L. Prehydration and combined spinal epidural labor analgesia [abstract]. Anesthesiology 2000;92(Suppl):A83.
    1. Macauley BD, Barton MD, Norris MC, Vlastos EJ, Bottros L. Prehydration and combined spinal epidural labor analgesia [abstract]. Anesthesiology 2000;93(3A):A‐1084.
Shannon 1998 {published data only}
    1. Shannon M, Crivelli K, Ramanathan S. Is intravenous fluid bolus necessary before subarachnoid fentanyl administration for labor analgesia?. Anesthesiology 1998;83(3A):A941. - PubMed
    1. Shannon MT, Ramanathan S. An intravenous fluid bolus is not necessary before administration of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1998;10(6):452‐6. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Eledjam 1989 {published data only}
    1. Eledjam JJ, Thomas H, Macheboeuf M, Baudin G, Ferrer JM, D'Athis F. Influence of vascular loading on the secretion of the atrial natriuretic factor during epidural analgesia (EA) for labour. Anesthesiology 1989;71:A876.
Evans 1986 {published data only}
    1. Evans SE, Crawford JS, Stevens ID, Durbin GM, Daya H. Fluid therapy for induced labour under epidural analgesia: biochemical consequences for mother and infant. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;93:329‐33. - PubMed
Murray 1989 {published data only}
    1. Murray AM, Morgan M, Whitwam JG. Crystalloid versus colloid for circulatory preload for epidural caesarean section. Anaesthesia 1989;44:463‐6. - PubMed
Zamora 1996 {published data only}
    1. Zamora JE, Rosaeg OP, Lindsay MP, Crossan ML. Acute intravenous hydration prior to epidural analgesia for labour: a comparison of two volumes of lactated ringer's solution. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1994;41:A60.
    1. Zamora JE, Rosaeg OP, Lindsay MP, Crossan ML. Acute intravenous hydration prior to epidural analgesia for labour: effects of two volumes of lactated ringer's solution on uterine contractions and maternal hemodynamics. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1995;80(S1):S578.
    1. Zamora JE, Rosaeg OP, Lindsay MP, Crossan ML. Haemodynamic consequences and uterine contractions following 0.5 or 1.0 litre crystalloid infusion before obstetric epidural analgesia. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1996;43:347‐52. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Hawthorne 2001 {published data only}
    1. Hawthorne L, Slaymaker A, Bamber J, Dresner M. Effect of fluid preload on maternal haemodynamics for low‐dose epidural analgesia in labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2001;10:312‐5. - PubMed
    1. Slaymaker A, Bamber J, Hawthorne L, Dresner M. Is a fluid preload necessary with low‐dose epidural in labour? [abstract]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1998;7:197‐8. - PubMed
Makris 2008 {published data only}
    1. Makris A, Palilexi L, Tsirogianni A, Zisopoulou V. Necessity of intravenous fluid preload before epidural analgesia during labour. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2008;33(5 Suppl 1):140.
Roofthooft 2007 {published data only}
    1. Roofthooft E, Dormael Y, Vandermeersch E, Devlieger R, Velde M. Combined spinal epidural analgesia during labour: is a prophylactic intravenous crystalloid fluid load required to prevent hypotension? [abstract]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2007;16(Suppl 1):S8.
Wells‐Brooks 2001 {published data only}
    1. Wells‐Brooks NY. Uterine contraction frequency changes following crystalloid infusion [thesis]. Tennessee: University of Tennessee, 2001.

Additional references

Clarke 2003
    1. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.2 [updated March 2003]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003. Oxford: Update Software. Updated quarterly.
D'Angelo 1994
    1. D'Angelo R, Anderson MT, Philip J, Eisenach JC. Intrathecal sufentanil compared to epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1209‐15. - PubMed
Emmett 2004
    1. Emmett RS, Cyna AM, Andrew M, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. - PubMed
Grant 1989
    1. Grant AM. Monitoring the fetus during labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC editor(s). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:846‐82.
Mandell 1996
    1. Mandell GL, Jamnback L, Ramanathan S. Hemodynamic effects of subarachnoid fentanyl in laboring parturients. Regional Anesthesia 1996;21:103‐11. - PubMed
Plaat 2001
    1. Plaat F. Routine fluid loading is unnecessary before low‐dose regional analgesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2001;10:292‐4.
Popham 2001
    1. Popham P. Routine fluid loading is unnecessary before low‐dose regional analgesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2001;10:294‐6.
Ramanathan 1983
    1. Ramanathan S, Masih A, Rock I, Chalon J, Turndorf H. Maternal and fetal effects of prophylactic hydration with crystalloids or colloids before epidural anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Analgesia 1983;62:673‐8. - PubMed
RevMan 2004 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 4.2. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2004.
Stavrou 1989
    1. Stravrou C, Hofmeyr G J, Boezaart A P. Prolonged fetal bradycardia during epidural analgesia. Incidence, timing and significance. South African Medical Journal 1989;77:66‐8. - PubMed
UK Dept Health 1998
    1. UK Department of Health. Why mothers die: Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994‐1996. London: TSO, 1998. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

CDSR 2002
    1. Hofmeyr GJ. Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000175] - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms