Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct 18;2003(4):CD004341.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004341.pub2.

Positive end-expiratory pressure for resuscitation of newborn infants at birth

C O'Donnell  1 , P Davis, C Morley
Affiliations

Positive end-expiratory pressure for resuscitation of newborn infants at birth

C O'Donnell et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Effective ventilation is the key to successful neonatal resuscitation. Positive pressure ventilation is initiated with manual ventilation devices which may or not deliver positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). PEEP is known to have beneficial effects in preterm animal models and its use is ubiquitous in mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care.

Objectives: To determine whether the use of PEEP during positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation reduces mortality or morbidity.

Search strategy: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. Pub Med (1966 to May 2004) was searched using the MeSH headings Infant, Newborn, Resuscitation, Positive Pressure Respiration and the text words Positive End-Expiratory Pressure or PEEP. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004) was searched using text words Newborn and Resuscitation. No language restrictions were applied. The abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research and the European Society for Pediatric Research, were searched from 1995-May 2004. Abstracts were also searched in Anaesthesiology, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Anaesthesia and Analgesia.

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing ventilation devices providing PEEP with those not providing PEEP in the resuscitation of infants at birth.

Data collection and analysis: Assessment of methodology regarding blinding of randomisation, intervention and outcome measurements as well as completeness of follow-up was planned. We planned to evaluate the treatment effect using a fixed effects model using relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. We planned an evaluation of heterogeneity to help determine the suitability of pooling results.

Main results: No studies were found meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.

Reviewers' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of PEEP during positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation. Randomised clinical trials comparing positive pressure ventilation with and without PEEP at neonatal resuscitation are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004341

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Upton 1991 {published data only}
    1. Upton CJ, Milner AD. Endotracheal resuscitation of neonates using a rebreathing bag. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1991;66:39‐42. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Finer 2003 {published data only}
    1. Finer N, Carlo W, Duara S, Fanaroff A, Donovan E for the NICHD Neonatal Network. Randomized pilot trial of delivery room CPAP in the ELBW infant. "Late breaker" abstract (LB‐10) at Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meeting May 2003 (http://www.pas‐meeting.org/2003Seattle/Abstracts/LBFullAbs.htm ‐ accessed 28th May2004). May 2003.

Additional references

Argiras 1987
    1. Argiras EP, Blakely CR, Dunnill MS, Otremski S, Sykes MK. High PEEP decreases hyaline membrane formation in surfactant deficient lungs. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1987;59:1278‐85. - PubMed
Bjorklund 1997
    1. Bjorklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Custedt T, John J, Robertson B, Werner O, Vilstrup CT. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatric Research 1997;42:348‐55. - PubMed
Graham 2001
    1. Graham AN, Finer NN. The use of continuous positive airways pressure and positive end‐expiratory pressure in the delivery room (abstract). Pediatric Research 2001;49:400A (2299).
ILCOR 2000
    1. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. International guidelines for neonatal resuscitation: An Excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Pediatrics 2000;106:E29. - PubMed
Jobe 2002
    1. Jobe AH, Kramer BW, Moss TJ, Newnham JP, Ikegami M. Decreased indicators of lung injury with continuous positive expiratory pressure in preterm lambs. Pediatric Research 2002;52:387‐92. - PubMed
Michna 1999
    1. Michna J, Jobe AH, Ikegami M. Positive end‐expiratory pressure preserves surfactant function in preterm lambs. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1999;160:634‐9. - PubMed
Milner 1991
    1. Milner AD. Resuscitation of the newborn. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1991;66:66‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Naik 2001
    1. Naik AS, Kallapur SG, Bachurski CJ, Jobe AH, Michna J, Kramer BW, Ikegami M. Effects of ventilation with different positive end‐expiratory pressures on cytokine expression in the preterm lamb lung. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;164:494‐8. - PubMed
O'Donnell(a) 2004
    1. O'Donnell CPF, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Neonatal resuscitation: review of ventilation equipment and survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2004;40:208‐12. - PubMed
O'Donnell(b) 2004
    1. O'Donnell CPF, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practice. Acta Paediatrica 2004;93:583‐8. - PubMed
Papile 1978
    1. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. Journal of Pediatrics 1978;92:529‐34. - PubMed
Probyn 2002
    1. Probyn ME, Hooper S, Morley CJ. Reduction in oxygen requirement using positive end‐expiratory pressure in a preterm lamb model of hyaline membrane disease (abstract). Pediatric Research 2002;51:A1954.
Sandhar 1988
    1. Sandhar BK, Niblett DJ, Argiras EP, Dunnill MS, Sykes MK. Effects of positive end‐expiratory pressure on hyaline membrane formation in a rabbit model of the neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine 1988;14:538‐46. - PubMed
Sarnat 1976
    1. Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Archives of Neurology 1976;33:696‐705. - PubMed
Saugstad 1998
    1. Saugstad OD. Practical aspects of resuscitating asphyxiated newborn infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 1998;157:S11‐S15. - PubMed
Thome 1998
    1. Thome U, Topfer A, Schaller P, Pohlandt F. The effect of positive end expiratory pressure, peak inspiratory pressure and inspiratory time on functional residual capacity in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 1998;157:831‐7. - PubMed
Vilstrup 1992
    1. Vilstrup CT, Bjorklund LJ, Larrson A, Lachmann B, Werner O. Functional residual capacity and ventilation homogeneity in mechanically ventilated small neonates. Journal of Applied Physiology 1992;73:276‐83. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources