Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Feb;36(2):195-200.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03451.x.

Anaesthesia for geriatric oesophagoscopy: isoflurane vs. alfentanil-methohexitone vs. propofol

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Anaesthesia for geriatric oesophagoscopy: isoflurane vs. alfentanil-methohexitone vs. propofol

M Oikkonen. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992 Feb.

Abstract

Twenty-one geriatric patients (68-86 years) undergoing 30 oesophagoscopic surgical procedures received either isoflurane (mean duration 40 min), alfentanil (-methohexitone) (30 min), or propofol (30 min) anaesthesia supplemented with nitrous oxide. Each of the three study groups comprised ten patients. The times elapsing from the end of anaesthesia until the patients became irritated by the endotracheal tube, and until their tracheas were extubated, appeared similar for the groups, as did the rapidity of awakening and the ensuing grade of consciousness. During anaesthesia, spontaneous ventilation prevailed in the isoflurane group, but at recovery no inter-group differences in respiratory rate were found. There were few statistically significant differences between the groups in arterial pressure or heart rate. Only propofol prevented temporary increases in heart rate and arterial pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources