Sirolimus-eluting stents for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of diffuse and recurrent in-stent restenosis
- PMID: 15505841
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20180
Sirolimus-eluting stents for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of diffuse and recurrent in-stent restenosis
Abstract
For recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR), surgical revascularization or brachytherapy is still the principal therapeutic options. The present investigation explores the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent to prevent restenosis in these lesions with a high risk of recurrence. In 22 consecutive patients with a recurrent and diffuse ISR, a sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted to cover the restenotic lesion. All patients were followed clinically for at least 1 year and underwent a repeat angiography after 7 months. A quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. The target vessel failure was 14% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, with an angiographic late loss of only 0.39 +/- 0.54. No subacute stent thrombosis was observed, and the 1-year event-free survival was 86%. The three cases with restenosis were all focal and could be successfully treated by additional drug-eluting stent implantation. This study showed the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of recurrent and diffuse ISR. The observed restenosis rate is lower than that reported after brachytherapy and suggests that sirolimus-eluting stents are a promising treatment option for ISR.
Comment in
-
Drug-eluting stents for secondary prevention of restenosis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Nov;63(3):265-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20199. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004. PMID: 15505858 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 15;97(8):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.034. Epub 2006 Mar 9. Am J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16616023
-
Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.165. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15644543 Clinical Trial.
-
Post-sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis treated with repeat percutaneous intervention: late angiographic and clinical outcomes.Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):2500-2. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130173.63105.4E. Epub 2004 May 17. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15148279
-
Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Mar 1;61(5):449-56. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.5.449. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004. PMID: 15018222 Review.
-
Systemic immunosuppressive therapy with oral Sirolimus after bare metal stent implantation: the missing alternative in the prevention of coronary restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2008 Nov;3(3):201-8. doi: 10.2174/157489008786263998. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2008. PMID: 18991795 Review.
Cited by
-
On the importance of modeling balloon folding, pleating, and stent crimping: An FE study comparing experimental inflation tests.Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Nov;35(11):e3249. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3249. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019. PMID: 31400057 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources