Breast cancer surveillance in women with hereditary risk due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
- PMID: 15507170
- DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2004.n.029
Breast cancer surveillance in women with hereditary risk due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
Abstract
Women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are known to be at substantially elevated risk for breast cancer. With increasing acceptance of genetic testing, significant numbers of mutation carriers are being identified, but evidence-based guidelines for the management of women at hereditary risk are lacking. This article reviews the most commonly recommended modalities employed in breast cancer surveillance for women at increased risk. It is apparent that the standard techniques of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and mammography are suboptimal for the identification of hereditary breast cancer. At least half of the cancers in this population appear to be detected by physical examination in the intervals between routine radiographic surveillance. Host factors (eg, breast density) and tumor features (rapid proliferative rates) likely contribute to the relative insensitivity of mammography. These factors may be mitigated by the deployment of screening techniques for breast cancer such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. However, the effect of incremental screening on either stage at diagnosis or breast cancer mortality has not been defined. In addition, the impact of the relatively limited specificity of these techniques on the quality of life (QOL) of women at risk has not been studied. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of incremental radiographic screening on outcomes, to delineate the best way to integrate the different modalities in terms of sequencing and frequency, and to identify interventions that will minimize the impact of intensive surveillance programs on the QOL of the women engaged in them.
Similar articles
-
Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):376-388. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161218. Epub 2017 Jun 13. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 28609204
-
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1317-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1317. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15367553
-
Prospective blinded surveillance screening of Swedish women with increased hereditary risk of breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(3):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4639-0. Epub 2018 Jan 9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018. PMID: 29318406 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer: new technologies for risk assessment and diagnosis.Mol Diagn. 2003;7(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/BF03260021. Mol Diagn. 2003. PMID: 14529321 Review.
-
[An integrated early detection concept in women with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer].Radiologe. 1997 Aug;37(8):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s001170050258. Radiologe. 1997. PMID: 9411474 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.J Genet Couns. 2007 Jun;16(3):241-60. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9090-7. Epub 2007 May 17. J Genet Couns. 2007. PMID: 17508274 Review.
-
Saliva samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping: an acceptable and sufficient means in improvement of risk estimation throughout mammographic diagnostics.Eur J Med Res. 2018 Apr 27;23(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0318-9. Eur J Med Res. 2018. PMID: 29703267 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer in Chinese women younger than age 40: are they different from their older counterparts?World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2554-61. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9589-6. World J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18408960
-
Liquid biopsy-based early tumor and minimal residual disease detection: New perspectives for cancer predisposition syndromes.Med Genet. 2023 Dec 5;35(4):259-268. doi: 10.1515/medgen-2023-2049. eCollection 2023 Dec. Med Genet. 2023. PMID: 38835740 Free PMC article.
-
Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;40(16):1721-1731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02209. Epub 2022 Mar 24. J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35324346 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous