Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;191(4):1339-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085.

Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Affiliations

Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Soon-Sup Shim et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

Study design: Amniotic fluid was retrieved from 219 patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes; the fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and mycoplasmas and assayed for neutrophil collagenase, which is also known as matrix metalloproteinase-8. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 was used because previous studies indicated that this was a sensitive and specific index of inflammation and that is correlated with the amniotic fluid white blood cell count. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL). Nonparametric and survival techniques were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The overall rate of intra-amniotic inflammation was 42% (93/219 samples); proven intra-amniotic infection was detected only in 23% (50/219 samples). Intra-amniotic inflammation with a negative amniotic fluid culture for micro-organisms was found in 23% (51/219 samples) and was as common as proven intra-amniotic infection. Pregnancy outcome was worse in patients with intra-amniotic inflammation and a negative culture than in those patients with a negative culture and without inflammation. There were no differences in the interval-to-delivery or rate of complications between patients with intra-amniotic inflammation and a negative culture and patients with proven amniotic fluid infection.

Conclusion: We conclude that intra-amniotic inflammation, regardless of culture result, is present in 42% of patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and that it is a risk factor for impending preterm delivery and adverse outcome. We propose that intra-amniotic inflammation, rather than infection, be used to classify and treat patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources