Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities
- PMID: 15509923
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities
Abstract
Rigid external distraction is a highly effective technique for correction of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with orofacial clefts. The clinical results after correction of sagittal maxillary deformities in both the adult and pediatric age groups have been stable. The purpose of this retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study was to review the long-term stability of the repositioned maxilla in cleft patients who underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction. Between April 1, 1995, and April 1, 1999, 17 consecutive patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia underwent maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction. There were 13 male patients and four female patients, with ages ranging from 5.2 to 23.6 years (mean, 12.6 years). After a modified complete high Le Fort I osteotomy and a latency period of 3 to 5 days, patients underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction until proper facial convexity and dental overjet and overbite were obtained. After active distraction, a 3- to 4-week period of rigid retention was undertaken; this was followed by removable elastic retention for 6 to 8 weeks using, during sleep time, an orthodontic protraction face mask. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively, after distraction, at 1 year after distraction, and 2 or more years after distraction. The mean follow-up was 3.3 years (minimum, 2.1 years; maximum, 5.3 years). The following measurements were obtained in each cephalogram: three linear horizontal and two linear vertical maxillary measurements, two angular craniomaxillary measurements, and one craniomandibular measurement. Differences between the preoperative and postoperative cephalometric values were analyzed by paired t tests (p < 0.05). The cephalometric analysis demonstrated postoperatively significant advancement of the maxilla. In addition, the mandibular plane angle opened 1.2 degrees after surgery. After the 1- to 3-year follow-up period, the maxilla was stable in the sagittal plane. Minimal anteroposterior growth was observed in the maxilla compared with that exhibited in the anterior cranial base. However, there was significant vertical maxillary growth over the 3-year observation period. The mandibular plane angle tended to decrease during the follow-up period. The cephalometric data from this study support the clinical impression of maxillary stability after maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction in cleft patients. This effective and stable technique is now considered for all pediatric patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia and for adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe deformities.
Similar articles
-
Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Oct;102(5):1360-72; discussion 1373-4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998. PMID: 9773990
-
Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Oct;68(10):2402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.018. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20605305
-
Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.J Craniofac Surg. 1999 Jul;10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199907000-00005. J Craniofac Surg. 1999. PMID: 10686880
-
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):CD010403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30095853 Free PMC article.
-
Cleft Lip and Palate: LeFort I Distraction with Halo and Hybrid Internal Maxillary Distractors.Clin Plast Surg. 2021 Jul;48(3):391-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 May 8. Clin Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34051893 Review.
Cited by
-
Skeletal stability after maxillary distraction osteogenesis or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate: A superimposition-based cephalometric analysis.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;28(2):925-934. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01227-0. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38363518 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1062. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071062. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35887559 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate Reconstruction of Large Full-Thickness Segmental Anterior Maxillary Defect with Bone Transport.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Nov;9(4):305-312. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592094. Epub 2016 Sep 15. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016. PMID: 27833709 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the hard and soft tissue changes after maxillary advancement with rigid external distractor in unilateral cleft lip and palate induced maxillary hypoplasia.Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Dec;71(Suppl 2):S355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015. PMID: 26843750 Free PMC article.
-
A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Sep;28(9):1577-88. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1776-y. Epub 2012 Aug 8. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012. PMID: 22872276 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous