Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;2(12):e383.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383. Epub 2004 Oct 26.

Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds

Affiliations

Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds

Stuart H M Butchart et al. PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

The rapid destruction of the planet's biodiversity has prompted the nations of the world to set a target of achieving a significant reduction in the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010. However, we do not yet have an adequate way of monitoring progress towards achieving this target. Here we present a method for producing indices based on the IUCN Red List to chart the overall threat status (projected relative extinction risk) of all the world's bird species from 1988 to 2004. Red List Indices (RLIs) are based on the number of species in each Red List category, and on the number changing categories between assessments as a result of genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The RLI for all bird species shows that their overall threat status has continued to deteriorate since 1988. Disaggregated indices show that deteriorations have occurred worldwide and in all major ecosystems, but with particularly steep declines in the indices for Indo-Malayan birds (driven by intensifying deforestation of the Sundaic lowlands) and for albatrosses and petrels (driven by incidental mortality in commercial longline fisheries). RLIs complement indicators based on species population trends and habitat extent for quantifying global trends in the status of biodiversity. Their main weaknesses are that the resolution of status changes is fairly coarse and that delays may occur before some status changes are detected. Their greatest strength is that they are based on information from nearly all species in a taxonomic group worldwide, rather than a potentially biased subset. At present, suitable data are only available for birds, but indices for other taxonomic groups are in development, as is a sampled index based on a stratified sample from all major taxonomic groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The RLI for All Bird Species
Sample size: 250 genuine status changes/2,469 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment. Error bars for 2004 RLI value based on estimated number of genuine status changes for 2000–2004 not yet detected owing to information time lags (see Materials and Methods for further details).
Figure 2
Figure 2. The RLI for All Bird Species in 1988–2004 Compared to Hypothetical Indices
Hypothetical indices show trends if no species had changed category, and if 10% or 50% of species in the categories from Near Threatened to Critically Endangered had been uplisted to a higher category of threat or downlisted to a lower category of threat over the period.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The RLI for All Bird Species with Categories Weighted by Relative Extinction Risk
Sample size: 250 genuine status changes/2,469 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment. Error bars for 2004 RLI value based on estimated number of genuine status changes for 2000–2004 not yet detected owing to information time lags (see Materials and Methods for further details).
Figure 4
Figure 4. RLIs for Birds in Different Biogeographic Realms
Sample sizes: Neotropical, 49 genuine status changes/834 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment; Afrotropical, 41/394; Australasian/Oceanic, 53/614; Palearctic, 34/238; Nearctic, 9/92; Indo-Malayan, 100/585.
Figure 5
Figure 5. RLIs for Birds in Different Habitats
Sample sizes: terrestrial, 206 genuine status changes/2,329 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment; freshwater, 31/226; marine, 12/133; shrubland/grassland, 45/481; forest, 169/1,513.
Figure 6
Figure 6. RLIs for Three Bird Families with High Conservation Profiles
Sample sizes: game birds, 15 genuine status changes/123 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment; raptors, 10/93; parrots, 19/148.
Figure 7
Figure 7. RLIs for Three Species Groups Targeted by Particular International Conservation Treaties: The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, the CMS, and the ACAP under the CMS
Sample sizes: waterbirds, 36 genuine status changes/238 species in categories Extinct in the Wild to Near Threatened in at least one assessment; albatrosses and petrels, 6/28; migrants, 50/313.

References

    1. Balmford A, Green RE, Jenkins M. Measuring the changing state of nature. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:326–330.
    1. BirdLife International. Cambridge and Barcelona: BirdLife International and Lynx Edicions; 2000. Threatened birds of the world; 852 pp.
    1. BirdLife International. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 2001. Threatened birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book; 3,038 pp.
    1. BirdLife International. Globally threatened bird forums. Available: http://208.185.149.227/WebX?13@106.EvPVayPZb4F.2@.1de4282b via the Internet. 2004a Accessed 20 April 2004.
    1. BirdLife International. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 2004b. State of the world's birds 2004: Indicators for our changing planet; 73 pp.

Publication types