Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming
- PMID: 15513246
- DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000756
Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming
Abstract
In three experiments, we examined feedforward and feedback consistency effects in word recognition. Feedforward consistency is the degree to which a word's pronunciation is consistent with that of similarly spelled words, and feedback consistency refers to whether there is more than one way to spell a pronunciation. Previously, Stone, Vanhoy, and Van Orden (1997) reported feedforward and feedback consistency effects for low-frequency words in a lexical decision task. We investigated the effect of feedforward and feedback consistency for both high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. In both tasks, we found that feedforward and feedback inconsistent words were processed more slowly than consistent words, regardless of word frequency. These findings indicate that both types of consistency are involved in visual word recognition.
Similar articles
-
Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 26. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 17258186
-
Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):686-713. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12109762
-
Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):274-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007. PMID: 17352611
-
Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.001. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 15485714
-
Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect in recognition and lexical decision.Am J Psychol. 1987 Spring;100(1):93-116. Am J Psychol. 1987. PMID: 3592027
Cited by
-
Interpreting chicken-scratch: lexical access for handwritten words.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):906-23. doi: 10.1037/a0019258. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20695708 Free PMC article.
-
Differential effects of orthographic and phonological consistency in cortex for children with and without reading impairment.Neuropsychologia. 2008 Dec;46(14):3210-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.024. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 18725239 Free PMC article.
-
Speed and accuracy of dyslexic versus typical word recognition: an eye-movement investigation.Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 9;5:1129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01129. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25346708 Free PMC article.
-
Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1292-1312. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01317-y. Behav Res Methods. 2020. PMID: 31950361 Free PMC article.
-
Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning.Sci Stud Read. 2017;21(1):31-45. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2016.1258702. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Sci Stud Read. 2017. PMID: 29333056 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources