Xenotransplantation and risks of zoonotic infections
- PMID: 15513301
- DOI: 10.1080/07853890410018826
Xenotransplantation and risks of zoonotic infections
Erratum in
- Ann Med. 2004;36(8):640
Abstract
The shortage of human organs and tissues for transplantation and the advances in immunology of rejection and in genetic engineering have renewed interest in xenotransplantation--the transplantation of animal organs, tissues or cells to humans. Clinical trials have involved the use of non-human primate, porcine, and bovine cells/tissues/organs. In recent years, research has focused mainly on pigs as donors (especially, pigs genetically engineered to carry some human genes). One of the major concerns in xenotransplantation is the risk of transmission of animal pathogens, particularly viruses, to recipients and the possible adaptation of such pathogens for human-to-human transmission. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) have been of special concern because of their ability to infect human cells and because, at present, they cannot be removed from the source animal's genome. To date, retrospective studies of humans exposed to live porcine cells/tissues have not found evidence of infection with PERV but more extensive research is needed. This article reviews infectious disease risks associated with xenotransplantation, some measures for minimizing that risk, and microbiological diagnostic methods that may be used in the follow-up of xenotransplant recipients.
Similar articles
-
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 5: Strategies to prevent transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses.Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00544.x. Xenotransplantation. 2009. PMID: 19799764
-
Xenotransplantation and pig endogenous retroviruses.Rev Med Virol. 2003 Sep-Oct;13(5):311-29. doi: 10.1002/rmv.404. Rev Med Virol. 2003. PMID: 12931341 Review.
-
Reappraisal of biosafety risks posed by PERVs in xenotransplantation.Rev Med Virol. 2008 Jan-Feb;18(1):53-65. doi: 10.1002/rmv.559. Rev Med Virol. 2008. PMID: 17987669 Review.
-
Is porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission still relevant?Transplant Proc. 2008 Mar;40(2):587-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.12.026. Transplant Proc. 2008. PMID: 18374136
-
Sensitive and specific immunological detection methods for porcine endogenous retroviruses applicable to experimental and clinical xenotransplantation.Xenotransplantation. 2001 May;8(2):125-35. Xenotransplantation. 2001. PMID: 11328583
Cited by
-
Scald management protocols - outcome differences in two different time periods using different treatment strategies.Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016 Jun 30;29(2):139-143. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016. PMID: 28149237 Free PMC article.
-
Biological Risks and Laboratory-Acquired Infections: A Reality That Cannot be Ignored in Health Biotechnology.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Apr 28;3:56. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00056. eCollection 2015. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015. PMID: 25973418 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Attitudes to Clinical Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation among Medical Providers and Patients.Kidney360. 2020 May 27;1(7):657-662. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002082020. eCollection 2020 Jul 30. Kidney360. 2020. PMID: 35372937 Free PMC article.
-
Skin xenotransplantation: Historical review and clinical potential.Burns. 2018 Nov;44(7):1738-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 27. Burns. 2018. PMID: 29602717 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spermatogonial stem cell technologies: applications from human medicine to wildlife conservation†.Biol Reprod. 2024 Oct 14;111(4):757-779. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioae109. Biol Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38993049 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical