Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct 30:4:15.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-4-15.

Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology: a case series

Affiliations

Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology: a case series

Jacques Beco et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock's canal, painful "skin rolling test") and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, the studied sample comprised 74 female patients who underwent a bilateral PND between 1995 and 2002. To accomplish the first aim, the patients sample was compared before and at least one year after surgery by means of descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. The second aim was achieved by means of a statistical comparison between the patient's group before the operation and a control group of 82 women without any of the following signs: prolapse, anal incontinence, perineodynia, dyschesia and history of pelvi-perineal surgery.

Results: When bilateral PND was the only procedure done to treat the symptoms, the cure rates of perineodynia, anal incontinence and urinary incontinence were 8/14, 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The frequency of the three clinical signs was significantly reduced. There was a significant reduction of anal and perineal PNTML and a significant increase of anal richness on EMG. The Odd Ratio of the three clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS was 16,97 (95% CI = 4,68 - 61,51).

Conclusion: This study suggests that bilateral PND can treat perineodynia, anal and urinary incontinence. The three clinical signs of PCS seem to be efficient to suspect this diagnosis. There is a need for further studies to confirm these preliminary results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of the 3 main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (perineodynia, anal incontinence, urinary incontinence) before surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Skin rolling test : the skin of the perineum is pinched just beneath the level of the anus and then rolled to the front searching for a sharp pain at one level. This sign is well known in the diagnosis of neuralgia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Left Alcock's canal (showed by the tip of the forceps) viewed from the mid side on a female cadaver: on the left the pudendal nerve, on the right the inferior rectal nerve on the finger.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Alcock's canal viewed from below like in the operating room (right side of a female cadaver): inferior rectal nerve (horizontal) showing the entrance of the canal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of PND on anal and bulbocavernosus (BC) richness on EMG. The box is defined by the sample mean plus or minus one standard error of the sample mean. The probability to obtain a value in the box is 67 %. The whiskers represent the 95% confidence intervals of the population means.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of PND on anal and perineal PNTML. The box-plots definitions are the same as in Figure 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beco J, de Bisschop G, Dijkstra R, Nelissen G, Mouchel J. [Perineology...reaching equilibrium and preserving it?] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1999;28:855–856. - PubMed
    1. Beco J, Mouchel J. Understanding the concept of perineology. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13:275–277. doi: 10.1007/s001920200060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beco J, Mouchel J. Perineology: a new area. Urogynaecologia International Journal. 2003;17:79–86.
    1. Juenemann KP, Lue TF, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Clinical significance of sacral and pudendal nerve anatomy. J Urol. 1988;139:74–80. - PubMed
    1. Shafik A. Pudendal canal syndrome. Description of a new syndrome and its treatment. Report of 7 cases. Coloproctology. 1991;13:102–110.

MeSH terms