Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated
- PMID: 15518938
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.002
Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of frequency of occurrence of stop signals in the stop-signal paradigm. Presenting stop signals less frequently resulted in faster reaction times to the go stimulus and a lower probability of inhibition. Also, go stimuli elicited larger and somewhat earlier P3 responses when stop signals occurred less frequently. Since the amplitude effect was more pronounced on trials when go signals were followed by fast than slow reactions, it probably reflected a stronger set to produce fast responses. N2 and P3 components to stop signals were observed to be larger and of longer latency when stop signals occurred less frequently. The amplitude enhancement of these N2 and P3 components were more pronounced for unsuccessful than for successful stop-signal trials. Moreover, the successfully inhibited stop trials elicited a frontocentral P3 whereas unsuccessfully inhibited stop trials elicited a more posterior P3 that resembled the classical P3b. P3 amplitude in the unsuccessfully inhibited condition also differed between waveforms synchronized with the stop signal and waveforms synchronized with response onset whereas N2 amplitude did not. Taken together these findings suggest that N2 reflected a greater significance of failed inhibitions after low probability stop signals while P3 reflected continued processing of the erroneous response after response execution.
Similar articles
-
ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.Psychophysiology. 2004 Jan;41(1):9-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x. Psychophysiology. 2004. PMID: 14692996
-
The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?Brain Cogn. 2006 Nov;62(2):98-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Jun 30. Brain Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16814442
-
Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm.Biol Psychol. 2006 Apr;72(1):96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 12. Biol Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16157441
-
Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks.Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):153-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004. Brain Cogn. 2004. PMID: 15518932 Review.
-
Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?Cortex. 2025 Feb;183:232-250. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 21. Cortex. 2025. PMID: 39754857 Review.
Cited by
-
Response inhibition in problematic social network sites use: an ERP study.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):868-880. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00879-9. Epub 2021 Mar 5. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33674995 Free PMC article.
-
Neural correlates of unpredictable Stop and non-Stop cues in overt and imagined execution.Psychophysiology. 2022 Jul;59(7):e14019. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14019. Epub 2022 Feb 27. Psychophysiology. 2022. PMID: 35224733 Free PMC article.
-
Event-related potential correlates of performance-monitoring in a lateralized time-estimation task.PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025591. Epub 2011 Oct 19. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22039418 Free PMC article.
-
Proactively Adjusting Stopping: Response Inhibition is Faster when Stopping Occurs Frequently.J Cogn. 2023 May 4;6(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.264. eCollection 2023. J Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37152832 Free PMC article.
-
Event-related fields evoked by vocal response inhibition: a comparison of younger and older adults.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jun;234(6):1525-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4555-2. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 26821315
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources