Clinical outcomes in managed-care patients with coronary heart disease treated aggressively in lipid-lowering disease management clinics: the alliance study
- PMID: 15519006
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.053
Clinical outcomes in managed-care patients with coronary heart disease treated aggressively in lipid-lowering disease management clinics: the alliance study
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine if an aggressive, focused low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering strategy was superior to usual care for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients enrolled in health maintenance organization or Veterans Administration settings.
Background: Statin therapy benefits are well established. No prospective, randomized studies have tested strategies to optimize these benefits in a "real-world" setting.
Methods: A total of 2,442 CHD patients with hyperlipidemia were randomized to either an aggressive treatment arm using atorvastatin or usual care and followed for 51.5 months on average. Atorvastatin-group patients were titrated to LDL-C goals of <80 mg/dl (2.1 mmol/l) or a maximum atorvastatin dose of 80 mg/day. Usual-care patients received any treatment deemed appropriate by their regular physicians. End point assessments were complete in 958 atorvastatin-group and 941 usual-care patients. Partial assessments occurred in 259 patients in the atorvastatin group and 284 patients in the usual care group who did not complete four years of study participation because of adverse events, withdrawn consent, or follow-up loss. The primary efficacy parameter was time to first cardiovascular event.
Results: A total of 289 (23.7%) patients in the atorvastatin group compared with 333 (27.7%) patients in the usual care group experienced a primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.97, p = 0.02). This reduction in morbidity was largely due to fewer non-fatal myocardial infarctions (4.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.0002). Levels of LDL-C were reduced more (34.3% vs. 23.3%, p < 0.0001) and National Cholesterol Education Program goals (LDL-C <100 mg/dl) more likely met at end-of-study visits (72.4% vs. 40.0%) in patients receiving atorvastatin compared with those receiving usual care.
Conclusions: An aggressive, focused statin therapy management strategy outperformed usual care in health maintenance organization and Veterans Administration clinic patients with CHD.
Comment in
-
Aggressive statin therapy in disease management clinics reduces cardiovascular morbidity for people with coronary heart disease. Commentary.Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Mar;9(1):76-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ebcm.2005.01.020. Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16379995 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Focused atorvastatin therapy in managed-care patients with coronary heart disease and CKD.Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 May;53(5):741-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.025. Epub 2009 Feb 11. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009. PMID: 19216014 Clinical Trial.
-
Twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label comparison of the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg/d and atorvastatin 10 mg/d in high-risk adults: a DISCOVERY study.Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1821-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.015. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15639694 Clinical Trial.
-
Statin use in a "real-world" clinical setting: aggressive lipid lowering compared with usual care in the Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events (ALLIANCE) trial.Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118 Suppl 12A:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.003. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 16356803
-
Hypertriglyceridemia: a review of clinical relevance and treatment options: focus on cerivastatin.Curr Med Res Opin. 2001;17(1):60-73. Curr Med Res Opin. 2001. PMID: 11464448 Review.
-
Pharmacologic options for aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering: benefits versus risks.Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 22;96(4A):60E-66E. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.007. Am J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16098846 Review.
Cited by
-
Statin effects on both low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins: is there a dual benefit?Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010 Jan;12(1):14-9. doi: 10.1007/s11883-009-0085-8. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010. PMID: 20425266 Review.
-
Statin therapy: is the percent reduction or the attained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level more important?Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007 Jan;9(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02693935. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007. PMID: 17169241 Review.
-
A look at statin cost-effectiveness in view of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Sep;16(9):438. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0438-9. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014. PMID: 25052768 Review.
-
Effects of an enhanced secondary prevention program for patients with heart disease: a prospective randomized trial.Can J Cardiol. 2007 Nov;23(13):1066-72. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70875-9. Can J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17985009 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Secondary prevention of major cerebrovascular events with seven different statins: a multi-treatment meta-analysis.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Aug 30;11:2517-2526. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S135785. eCollection 2017. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017. PMID: 28919704 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous