Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts. Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography
- PMID: 15519022
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.048
Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts. Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to perform a head-to-head comparison between single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to evaluate hemodynamic significance of angiographic findings in bypass grafts.
Background: The hemodynamic significance of a bypass graft stenosis may not always accurately be determined from the coronary angiogram. A variety of diagnostic tests (invasive or noninvasive) can further characterize the hemodynamic consequence of a lesion.
Methods: Fifty-seven arterial and vein grafts in 25 patients were evaluated by angiography, SPECT perfusion imaging, and coronary flow velocity reserve determination by CMR. Based on angiography and SPECT, four different groups could be identified: 1) no significant stenosis (<50%), normal perfusion; 2) significant stenosis (>/=50%), abnormal perfusion; 3) significant stenosis, normal perfusion (no hemodynamic significance); and 4) no significant stenosis, abnormal perfusion (suggesting microvascular disease).
Results: A complete evaluation was obtained in 46 grafts. Single-photon emission computed tomography and CMR provided similar information in 37 of 46 grafts (80%), illustrating good agreement (kappa = 0.61, p < 0.001). Eight grafts perfused a territory with scar tissue. When agreement between SPECT and CMR was restricted to grafts without scar tissue, it improved to 84% (kappa = 0.68). Integration of angiography with SPECT categorized 14 lesions in group 1, 23 in group 2, 6 in group 3, and 3 in group 4. Single-photon emission computed tomography and CMR agreement per group was 86%, 78%, 100%, and 33%, respectively.
Conclusions: Head-to-head comparison showed good agreement between SPECT and CMR for functional evaluation of bypass grafts. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance may offer an alternative method to SPECT for functional characterization of angiographic lesions.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 20;40(10):1848-55. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02491-9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 12446070 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemodynamic evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: relative merits of Doppler flow velocity and SPECT perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.04.015. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16171714
-
A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Nov 6;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0398-7. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017. PMID: 29110669 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):e002666. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25596143 Review.
-
Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 May;16(5):483. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0483-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24718671 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Use of quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion mapping for characterization of ischemia in patients with left internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafts.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jun 17;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00763-y. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021. PMID: 34134696 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical