Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis
- PMID: 15520423
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00007
Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis
Abstract
Background: Timely, accurate detection of renal artery stenosis is important because this disorder may be a potentially curable cause of hypertension and renal impairment.
Objective: To determine the validity of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection of renal artery stenosis.
Design: Prospective multicenter comparative study conducted from 1998 to 2001. Two panels of 3 observers judged CTA and MRA image data and were blinded to all other results. Digital subtraction angiography images were evaluated by consensus.
Setting: 3 large teaching hospitals and 3 university hospitals in the Netherlands.
Patients: 402 hypertensive patients with suspected renal artery stenosis were included. A group of 356 patients who underwent all 3 diagnostic tests was used for analysis.
Measurements: Reproducibility was assessed by calculating interobserver agreement. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic variables. Atherosclerotic stenoses of 50% or greater and fibromuscular dysplasia were considered clinically relevant.
Results: Twenty percent of patients who underwent all 3 tests had clinically relevant renal artery stenosis. Moderate interobserver agreement was found, with kappa values ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 for CTA and 0.40 to 0.51 for MRA. The combined sensitivity and specificity were 64% (95% CI, 55% to 73%) and 92% (CI, 90% to 95%) for CTA and 62% (CI, 54% to 71%) and 84% (CI, 81% to 87%) for MRA.
Limitations: Eighteen percent of the patients were included nonconsecutively. Digital subtraction angiography may be an imperfect reference test.
Conclusion: Computed tomographic angiography and MRA are not reproducible or sensitive enough to rule out renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients. Therefore, DSA remains the diagnostic method of choice. *For a list of the other investigators and research coordinators who participated in RADISH, see the Appendix.
Comment in
-
Pitfalls in imaging for renal artery stenosis.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):730-1. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15520432 No abstract available.
-
Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography were specific, but could not rule out renal artery stenosis.ACP J Club. 2005 May-Jun;142(3):80. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 15862079 No abstract available.
-
Commentary. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis.Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):180-2. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700229. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005. PMID: 16110398 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):I66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15520418 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.Ren Fail. 2007;29(3):295-302. doi: 10.1080/08860220601166305. Ren Fail. 2007. PMID: 17497443
-
Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):162-8. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.03.001. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24948209
-
Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.Radiol Med. 2006 Apr;111(3):459-68. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0042-3. Epub 2006 Apr 11. Radiol Med. 2006. PMID: 16683091 English, Italian.
-
[Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].J Mal Vasc. 2000 Dec;25(5):312-320. J Mal Vasc. 2000. PMID: 11148391 Review. French.
-
Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2219-29. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2826-6. Epub 2005 Jun 28. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15983776 Review.
Cited by
-
Renovascular hypertension associated with pseudoaneurysm following blunt trauma.Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Oct;62(4):839-43. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.034. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013. PMID: 23518197 Free PMC article.
-
To Stent or Not to Stent? Update on Revascularization for Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):45. doi: 10.1007/s11906-016-0655-4. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016. PMID: 27130448 Review.
-
Fibromuscular dysplasia--a rare cause of renovascular hypertension. Case study and overview of the literature data.J Med Life. 2012 Sep 15;5(3):316-20. Epub 2012 Sep 25. J Med Life. 2012. PMID: 23049635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Analysis of 64-row multidetector CT images for preoperative angiographic evaluation of potential living kidney donors].Radiologe. 2008 Jul;48(7):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1559-8. Radiologe. 2008. PMID: 17999043 German.
-
Diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: improving patient selection and outcomes.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Mar;6(3):176-90. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1448. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009. PMID: 19234498 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical