Meta-analysis: angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction
- PMID: 15520426
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00011
Meta-analysis: angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;42(5):391. Dosage error in article text
Abstract
Background: The role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in treating patients with chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been controversial, and recent clinical trials provide more information on this topic.
Purpose: To quantify the effect of ARBs when compared with placebo (with and without background angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) and ACE inhibitors on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure and high-risk acute MI.
Data sources: Data from original research published through 13 November 2003.
Study selection: Predefined criteria were used to identify 24 trials.
Data extraction: 2 reviewers independently collected information on study characteristics and data on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization.
Data synthesis: 24 trials involving 38 080 patients were included. Analysis of chronic heart failure trials revealed that 1) ARBs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00]) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR, 0.64 [CI, 0.53 to 0.78]) as compared with placebo; 2) for ARBs versus ACE inhibitors, all-cause mortality (OR, 1.06 [CI, 0.90 to 1.26]) and heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.95 [CI, 0.80 to 1.13]) did not differ; 3) and for combinations of ARBs plus ACE inhibitors versus ACE inhibitors alone, all-cause mortality was not reduced (OR, 0.97 [CI, 0.87 to 1.08]) but heart failure hospitalizations were reduced (OR, 0.77 [CI, 0.69 to 0.87]). For patients with high-risk acute MI, 2 randomized trials compared ARBs with ACE inhibitors but did not reveal differences in all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.
Limitations: Comparative economic data between ARBs and ACE inhibitors are lacking.
Conclusions: Because ACE inhibitors and ARBs do not differ in efficacy for reducing all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure and in patients with high-risk acute MI, ARBs should be regarded as suitable alternatives to ACE inhibitors.
Comment in
-
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):386-7; author reply 388-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15738459 No abstract available.
-
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):388; author reply 388-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00019. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15738461 No abstract available.
-
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):388; author reply 388-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00018. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15738462 No abstract available.
-
Angiotensin receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors are similarly effective in chronic heart failure and in high-risk acute myocardial infarction. Commentary.Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Mar;9(1):38-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ebcm.2005.01.022. Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16379985 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous