Electrocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock, risk prediction, and the effects of emergency revascularization: results from the SHOCK trial
- PMID: 15523311
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.012
Electrocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock, risk prediction, and the effects of emergency revascularization: results from the SHOCK trial
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters as predictors of 1-year mortality in patients developing cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to document associations between these ECG parameters and the survival benefit of emergency revascularization versus initial medical stabilization.
Background: Emergency revascularization reduces the risk of mortality in patients developing cardiogenic shock after AMI. The prognostic value of ECG parameters in such patients is unclear, and it is uncertain whether emergency revascularization reduces the mortality risk denoted by ECG parameters.
Methods: In a prospective substudy of 198 SHOCK (SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK) trial patients, ECGs recorded within 12 hours of shock were interpreted by personnel blinded to the patients' treatment assignment and outcome.
Results: The baseline heart rate was higher in non-survivors than in survivors (106 +/- 20 versus 95 +/- 24 beats/minute, P = .001). There was a significant association between the QRS duration and 1-year mortality in medically stabilized patients (115 +/- 28 ms in non-survivors versus 99 +/- 23 ms in survivors, P = .012), but not in emergently revascularized patients (110 +/- 31 versus 116 +/- 27 ms respectively, P = .343). The interaction between the QRS duration, mortality and treatment assignment was significant (P = .009). Among patients with inferior AMI, a greater sum of ST depression was associated with higher 1-year mortality in medically stabilized patients (P = .029), but not in emergently revascularized patients (P = .613, treatment interaction P = .025). On multivariate analysis, the independent mortality predictors were increasing age, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, heart rate, sum of ST depression in medically stabilized patients, and interaction (P = .016) between a prolonged QRS duration and treatment assignment. The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality per 20 ms increase in the QRS duration was 1.19 (95% CI 0.98-1.46) in medically stabilized patients and 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.03) in emergently revascularized patients.
Conclusion: ECG parameters identified patients with cardiogenic shock who were at high risk. Emergency revascularization eliminated the incremental mortality risk associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with a prolonged QRS duration, or inferior AMI accompanied by precordial ST depression. Prospective assessments of the magnitude of the treatment effect based on ECG parameters are required.
Similar articles
-
Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 19;46(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.061. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16022953 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):1992-2001. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540948. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 16186436 Clinical Trial.
-
Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?Eur Heart J. 2001 Mar;22(6):472-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2312. Eur Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11237542
-
Cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction and outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention.Acute Card Care. 2008;10(3):131-43. doi: 10.1080/17482940801983006. Acute Card Care. 2008. PMID: 18972627 Review.
-
Surgical treatment of acute myocardial infarction.Ital Heart J. 2004 Jun;5 Suppl 6:92S-99S. Ital Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15185921 Review.
Cited by
-
The Value of Prolonged QRS in Patients with Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.Int J Heart Fail. 2020 Apr 6;2(2):118-120. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2020.0013. eCollection 2020 Apr. Int J Heart Fail. 2020. PMID: 36263290 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Timing, setting and incidence of cardiovascular complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Can J Cardiol. 2006 Oct;22(12):1047-52. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70320-8. Can J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 17036099 Free PMC article.
-
Serial NT-proBNP measurements for risk stratification of patients with decompensated heart failure.Herz. 2010 Oct;35(7):488-95. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3377-4. Herz. 2010. PMID: 20927502
-
Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.Cardiol Rev. 2018 Sep/Oct;26(5):255-266. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000190. Cardiol Rev. 2018. PMID: 29300230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Sep;23(5):e12561. doi: 10.1111/anec.12561. Epub 2018 May 30. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018. PMID: 29846022 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical