Dose sparing with intradermal injection of influenza vaccine
- PMID: 15525714
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043540
Dose sparing with intradermal injection of influenza vaccine
Abstract
Background: The loss of half the U.S. supply of influenza vaccine due to contamination has created a critical shortage. Dose-sparing strategies that use intradermal delivery of vaccines may be one approach to consider.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label trial outside the influenza season in 100 healthy adults 18 to 40 years of age to compare the immunogenicity and safety of intradermal immunization with influenza vaccine with standard intramuscular immunization. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a single intramuscular dose of 0.5 ml of trivalent influenza vaccine, containing at least 15 microg of hemagglutinin per strain, by means of a prefilled syringe or a single intradermal dose of 0.1 ml, containing at least 3 microg of hemagglutinin per strain, by means of a fine-gauge needle; both injections were in the deltoid region. Changes in the hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer were assessed by comparing geometric mean titers and fold increases relative to baseline values and by comparing changes in the seroconversion and seroprotection rates. Local and systemic adverse events were assessed after both types of vaccination.
Results: Subjects who received an intradermal injection with one fifth the standard dose of influenza vaccine had increases in the geometric mean HAI titer by a factor of 15.2 for the H1N1 strain in the vaccine, 19.0 for the H3N2 strain, and 12.4 for the B strain on day 21, as compared with respective increases by a factor of 14.9, 7.1, and 15.3 for the intramuscular injection of the standard dose. Seroconversion and seroprotection rates were similar in the two groups on day 21, ranging from 66 to 82 percent and 84 to 100 percent, respectively. Local reactions were significantly more frequent among recipients of intradermal injections than among recipients of intramuscular injections, but such reactions were mild and transient.
Conclusions: In this study of young adults, intradermal administration of one fifth the standard intramuscular dose of an influenza vaccine elicited immunogenicity that was similar to or better than that elicited by intramuscular injection. Intradermal administration could be used to expand the supplies of influenza vaccine, but further studies are needed before this strategy can be recommended for routine use.
Comment in
-
Intradermal influenza vaccination--can less be more?N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 25;351(22):2330-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048314. Epub 2004 Nov 3. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15525715 No abstract available.
-
Intradermal vaccination against influenza.N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):1044-6; author reply 1044-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200503103521019. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15758019 No abstract available.
-
Intradermal vaccination against influenza.N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):1044-6; author reply 1044-6. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15761999 No abstract available.
-
Intradermal vaccination against influenza.N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):1044-6; author reply 1044-6. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15762000 No abstract available.
-
Intradermal injection of reduced-dose influenza vaccine was immunogenic in young adults.ACP J Club. 2005 May-Jun;142(3):68-9. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 15862068 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of a novel microneedle device for dose sparing intradermal influenza vaccination in healthy adults.Vaccine. 2009 Jan 14;27(3):454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.077. Epub 2008 Nov 18. Vaccine. 2009. PMID: 19022318 Clinical Trial.
-
Serum antibody responses after intradermal vaccination against influenza.N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 25;351(22):2286-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043555. Epub 2004 Nov 3. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15525713 Clinical Trial.
-
Improved antibody responses in infants less than 1 year old using intradermal influenza vaccination.Vaccine. 2008 May 23;26(22):2700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Mar 31. Vaccine. 2008. PMID: 18436353 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and Safety of Reduced-Dose Intradermal vs Intramuscular Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35693. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33560425 Free PMC article.
-
Fluzone(®) Intradermal vaccine: a promising new chance to increase the acceptability of influenza vaccination in adults.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012 Jan;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.154. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012. PMID: 22149703 Review.
Cited by
-
Should the General Practitioner Consider Mesotherapy (Intradermal Therapy) to Manage Localized Pain?Pain Ther. 2016 Jun;5(1):123-6. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0052-3. Epub 2016 May 26. Pain Ther. 2016. PMID: 27229350 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine at reduced intradermal and full intramuscular doses among healthy young adults.Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2013 Jul;2(2):115-9. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2013.2.2.115. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2013. PMID: 23858402 Free PMC article.
-
Local response to microneedle-based influenza immunization in the skin.mBio. 2012 Mar 6;3(2):e00012-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00012-12. Print 2012. mBio. 2012. PMID: 22396479 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing influenza vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy through infection mimicry using silk microneedles.Vaccine. 2021 Sep 7;39(38):5410-5421. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.064. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Vaccine. 2021. PMID: 34391593 Free PMC article.
-
Stability of influenza vaccine coated onto microneedles.Biomaterials. 2012 May;33(14):3756-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.054. Epub 2012 Feb 21. Biomaterials. 2012. PMID: 22361098 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical