Surgical strategies for treating patients with pineal region tumors
- PMID: 15527093
- DOI: 10.1023/b:neon.0000041885.09226.2d
Surgical strategies for treating patients with pineal region tumors
Abstract
Optimal management of pineal region tumors depends on securing an accurate histologic diagnosis to facilitate management customized to the nuances of specific pathologies. As an initial step, surgical intervention by either stereotactic biopsy or open surgery is necessary to obtain tissue for pathologic examination. Stereotactic biopsy has the benefit of relative ease and minimal morbidity but is associated with greater likelihood of diagnostic inaccuracy compared to open surgery where more extensive tissue sampling is possible. The role of surgical debulking in the management of pineal tumors is clearly defined for some tumors but is less evident for others. Among the one third of pineal tumors that are benign or low grade, complete surgical resection is achievable and constitutes optimal management with excellent long-term recurrence-free survival. The benefits of aggressive surgical resection among malignant tumors are less clear but several studies have correlated degree of tumor removal with improved outcome. Advances in technology, surgical technique, and post-operative care have minimized surgical complications, however all surgical procedures in the pineal region, including both stereotactic biopsy and open surgery, are potentially hazardous. Advanced judgment, experience, and expertise are necessary to achieve rates of success sufficient to justify aggressive management. Management strategies using stereotactic biopsy, endoscopy, and radiosurgery can also provide favorable outcomes in some cases. Selective incorporation of these innovations can be expected to improve the already highly favorable outcome for all pineal region tumors.
Similar articles
-
Microsurgical resection of pineal region tumors.J Neurooncol. 2016 Nov;130(2):351-366. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2138-5. Epub 2016 May 19. J Neurooncol. 2016. PMID: 27193692 Review.
-
Efficacy of neuroendoscopic procedures in minimally invasive preferential management of pineal region tumors: a prospective study.J Neurosurg. 2000 Aug;93(2):245-53. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0245. J Neurosurg. 2000. PMID: 10930010
-
Surgical approaches to the pineal region.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;22(3):367-80, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2011.05.007. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011. PMID: 21801985 Review.
-
Stereotactic biopsy considerations for pineal tumors.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;22(3):359-66, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2011.05.008. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011. PMID: 21801984 Review.
-
Extent of Resection and Long-Term Survival of Pineal Region Tumors in Helsinki Neurosurgery.World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e379-e391. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.169. Epub 2019 Jul 30. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 31369883
Cited by
-
Management of pineal region tumors.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(6):505-16. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0025-6. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17032562 Review.
-
Primary CNS germ cell tumors in Japan and the United States: an analysis of 4 tumor registries.Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14(9):1194-200. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos155. Epub 2012 Aug 6. Neuro Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22869621 Free PMC article.
-
Arterial vascularization of the pineal gland.Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Oct;29(10):1835-41. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-2018-z. Epub 2013 Jan 20. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013. PMID: 23334574
-
Keyhole Surgery of Pineal Area Tumors - Personal Experience in 22 Patients.Transl Neurosci. 2017 Dec 29;8:207-210. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2017-0028. eCollection 2017. Transl Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 29340227 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscope-Assisted Microsurgery in Pediatric Cases With Pineal Region Tumors: A Study of 18 Cases Series.Front Surg. 2021 Aug 3;8:641196. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.641196. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34414209 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials