Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Nov;54(508):832-7.

Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Hollie V Thomas  1 , Glyn Lewis, Margaret Watson, Truda Bell, Ita Lyons, Keith Lloyd, Scott Weich, Deborah Sharp
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Hollie V Thomas et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Nov.

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.

Design of study: Individual patient randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.

Method: 762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.

Results: Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3% greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of a computer-generated report provided to the GP as part of the intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recruitment and randomisation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Goldberg D, Huxley P. Common mental disorders. London: Routledge; 1992.
    1. Kessler D, Lloyd K, Lewis G, Pereira Gray D. Cross sectional study of symptom attribution and recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care. BMJ. 1999;318:436–439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kessler D, Bennewith O, Lewis G, Sharp D. Detection of depression and anxiety in primary care: follow up study. BMJ. 2002;325:1016–1017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg D, Williams P. A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1988.
    1. Gilbody S, House AO, Sheldon TA. Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. BMJ. 2001;322:406–409. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types