Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Nov;54(508):858-61.

Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements

Ian Hill-Smith  1
Affiliations
Review

Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements

Ian Hill-Smith. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Nov.

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, fetal movement counts have been recommended to women in the second half of pregnancy as a way of monitoring fetal wellbeing and providing an early warning of fetal distress. However, guidance from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends abandoning this. Evidence is reviewed to show that the chance of preventing physical damage to the fetus is indeed low. The activity of monitoring movements has been favoured by the majority of women. The new NICE guidance is useful to clarify professional understanding of the limitation of counting fetal movements, but women who notice decreased movements will still need referral for human factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Clinical Guideline CG6 Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: National Institute for Clinical Evidence; 2003. http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/Antenatal_Care.pdf (accessed 10 Aug 2004)
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. New guideline for the NHS on the care of pregnant women. London: National Institute for Clinical Evidence; 2003. [press release]. http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=90566 (accessed 29 Sep 2004)
    1. Wathen B, Dean T. An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(499):103–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macones GA, Depp R. Fetal monitoring. In: Wildschut HIJ, Weiner CP, Peters TJ, editors. When to screen in obstetrics and gynaecology. London: WB Saunders; 1996. pp. 202–218.
    1. Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2(8659):345–349. - PubMed