Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov;70(11):6501-11.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6501-6511.2004.

Frequency and spatial distribution of environmental Campylobacter spp

Affiliations

Frequency and spatial distribution of environmental Campylobacter spp

P E Brown et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Nov.

Abstract

Humans are exposed to Campylobacter spp. in a range of sources via both food and environmental pathways. For this study, we explored the frequency and distribution of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in a 10- by 10-km square rural area of Cheshire, United Kingdom. The area contains approximately 70, mainly dairy, farms and is used extensively for outdoor recreational activities. Campylobacter spp. were isolated from a range of environmental samples by use of a systematic sampling grid. Livestock (mainly cattle) and wildlife feces and environmental water and soil samples were cultured, and isolates were presumptively identified by standard techniques. These isolates were further characterized by PCR. Campylobacter jejuni was the most prevalent species in all animal samples, ranging from 11% in samples from nonavian wildlife to 36% in cattle feces, and was isolated from 15% of water samples. Campylobacter coli was commonly found in water (17%) and sheep (21%) samples, but rarely in other samples. Campylobacter lari was recovered from all sample types, with the exception of sheep feces, and was found in moderate numbers in birds (7%) and water (5%). Campylobacter hyointestinalis was only recovered from cattle (7%) and birds (1%). The spatial distribution and determinants of C. jejuni in cattle feces were examined by the use of model-based spatial statistics. The distribution was consistent with very localized within-farm or within-field transmission and showed little evidence of any larger-scale spatial dependence. We concluded that there is a potentially high risk of human exposure to Campylobacter spp., particularly C. jejuni, in the environment of our study area. The prevalence and likely risk posed by C. jejuni-positive cattle feces in the environment diminished as the fecal material aged. After we took into account the age of the fecal material, the absence or presence of rain, and the presence of bird feces, there was evidence of significant variation in the prevalence of C. jejuni-positive cattle feces between grazing fields but no evidence of spatial clustering beyond this resolution. The spatial pattern of C. jejuni is therefore consistent with that for an organism that is ubiquitous in areas contaminated with cattle feces, with a short-scale variation in infection intensity that cannot be explained solely by variations in the age of the fecal material. The observed pattern is not consistent with large-scale transmission attributable to watercourses, wildlife territories, or other geographical features that transcend field and farm boundaries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Locations of environmental samples for isolation of Campylobacter spp. in a subregion of the study area. (a) Secondary points where feces were sought. (b) Secondary points where cattle feces were present.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Locations of secondary sampling points that were negative (·) and positive (▪) for C. jejuni in cattle feces. Samples were identified as being positive by standard culture methods, and isolates were confirmed by PCR.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Centers of primary squares from which at least one sample of cattle feces tested positive (▪) and from which no samples tested positive (·) for C. lari and C. hyointestinalis. (a) C. lari. (b) C. hyointestinalis.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Variograms with observations at the same secondary point (▪) and at distances within primary squares (•), within fill-in squares (▵), and between primary squares (+), along with permutation envelopes. (a) C. jejuni. (b) C. coli. (c) C. lari. (d) C. hyointestinalis. (e) Other Campylobacter spp.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Posterior means of the spatial random effects, square random effects, and field random effects. White areas correspond to locations without observations. (a) Spatial effect Ai. (b) Independent random effect Bi.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Variogram of the posterior means of the field risk factors for C. jejuni (○) and of the permutation-based confidence region (shaded area).
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Posterior means of field risk factors for C. jejuni plotted against the field risk factors for C. hyointestinalis.

References

    1. Adak, G. K., J. M. Cowden, S. Nicholas, and H. S. Evan. 1995. The public-health laboratory service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of campylobacter infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:15-22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett, N. J. 1986. Communicable disease associated with milk and dairy-products in England and Wales—1983-1984. J. Infect. 12:265-272. - PubMed
    1. Besag, J., P. Green, D. Higdon, and K. Mengersen. 1995. Bayesian computation and stochastic systems. Statist. Sci. 10:3-66.
    1. Broman, T., H. Palmgren, S. Bergstrom, M. Sellin, J. Waldenstrom, M. L. Danielsson-Tham, and B. Olsen. 2002. Campylobacter jejuni in black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus): prevalence, genotypes, and influence on C. jejuni epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4594-4602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDSC. 2000. Sentinel surveillance of Campylobacter in England and Wales. Commun. Dis. Rep. Wkly. 10:169, 172. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources