Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK: review of the literature
- PMID: 15530945
- DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.08.003
Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK: review of the literature
Erratum in
- Surv Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep-Oct;50(5):502-4
Abstract
Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is a relatively new laser surgical procedure that combines certain elements of both laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to improve the risk/benefit ratio. Diluted alcohol is used to loosen the epithelial adhesion to the corneal stroma. The loosened epithelium is moved aside from the treatment zone as a hinged sheet. Laser ablation of the subepithelial stroma is performed before the epithelial sheet is returned to its original position. We reviewed the literature regarding modifications of the technique, indications, outcomes, and complications, as well as wound healing after LASEK surgery. This literature review of 1,421 LASEK-treated eyes provided many findings: 1) The long-term stable results in the absence of serious complications, such as infections, recurrent erosions, scars, or late-onset corneal haze formation in patients re-examined up to 5 years after LASEK; 2) Epithelial closure with recovery of functional vision was completed at days 4 to 7 in most cases; 3) A tendency toward overcorrection with PRK nomograms; 4) We hypothesize that this tendency may be due to the decreased wound healing response, which may lead to myopic regression in PRK; and 5) Postoperative discomfort and prolonged visual recovery until the epithelium closes remain the biggest disadvantages of LASEK compared to LASIK. LASEK surgery is especially valuable in patients with thin corneas who would not qualify for LASIK surgery. However, a potential superiority of LASEK to LASIK in wavefront guided ablations still remains speculative.
Similar articles
-
Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2041-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.026. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 18053901
-
Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser.Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.049. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15652828 Clinical Trial.
-
Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Aug;33(8):1376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.024. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 17662427
-
LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications.Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;18(1):2-10. doi: 10.1076/soph.18.1.2.14074. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 12759854 Review.
-
LASEK (laser subepithelial keratomileusis).Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;13(4):261-3. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200208000-00014. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002. PMID: 12165712 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of prophylactic and therapeutic mitomycin C on corneal apoptosis, cellular proliferation, haze, and long-term keratocyte density in rabbits.J Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;22(6):562-74. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060601-08. J Refract Surg. 2006. PMID: 16805119 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Sep;19(3):304-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.97931. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22837624 Free PMC article.
-
Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism.J Optom. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 14. J Optom. 2018. PMID: 27751694 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of pain after subepithelial versus conventional accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus.Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1249-1254. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0935-x. Epub 2018 May 7. Int Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 29736691
-
Repeatability, Reproducibility and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Two Noncontact Pachymetry Devices.Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019 Spring;8(1):34-39. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30923721 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources