Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
- PMID: 15532670
- DOI: 10.1121/1.1784440
Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
Erratum in
- J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Mar;119(3):1888
Abstract
This paper describes a shortened and improved version of the Speech in Noise (SIN) Test (Etymotic Research, 1993). In the first two of four experiments, the level of a female talker relative to that of four-talker babble was adjusted sentence by sentence to produce 50% correct scores for normal-hearing subjects. In the second two experiments, those sentences-in-babble that produced either lack of equivalence or high across-subject variability in scores were discarded. These experiments produced 12 equivalent lists, each containing six sentences, with one sentence at each adjusted signal-to-noise ratio of 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, and 0 dB. Six additional lists were also made equivalent when the scores of particular pairs were averaged. The final lists comprise the "QuickSIN" test that measures the SNR a listener requires to understand 50% of key words in sentences in a background of babble. The standard deviation of single-list scores is 1.4 dB SNR for hearing-impaired subjects, based on test-retest data. A single QuickSIN list takes approximately one minute to administer and provides an estimate of SNR loss accurate to +/-2.7 dB at the 95% confidence level.
Similar articles
-
The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Sep;23(8):590-605. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.9. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22967734 Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.3. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013. PMID: 23636208
-
An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):844-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17675590 Clinical Trial.
-
Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists.J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):157-67. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.3.2. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006. PMID: 16646276
-
The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517744675. doi: 10.1177/2331216517744675. Trends Hear. 2017. PMID: 29237334 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3477-86. doi: 10.1121/1.4921601. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015. PMID: 26093435 Free PMC article.
-
Speech perception in older hearing impaired listeners: benefits of perceptual training.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 2;10(3):e0113965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113965. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25730330 Free PMC article.
-
Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 2;10(3):e0114922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114922. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25730423 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of Sentences Without Semantic Context to Complement the Basic English Lexicon Sentences.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Nov 13;63(11):3847-3854. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00174. Epub 2020 Oct 13. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020. PMID: 33049146 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):81-8. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0291). Epub 2012 Jun 28. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013. PMID: 22744139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous