Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1733-49.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00315.x.

An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer

Affiliations

An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer

Ann B Nattinger et al. Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Health Serv Res. 41:302.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a clinically informed algorithm that uses solely Medicare claims to identify, with a high positive predictive value, incident breast cancer cases.

Data source: Population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Tumor Registry data linked to Medicare claims, and Medicare claims from a 5 percent random sample of beneficiaries in SEER areas.

Study design: An algorithm was developed using claims from 1995 breast cancer patients from the SEER-Medicare database, as well as 1995 claims from Medicare control subjects. The algorithm was validated on claims from breast cancer subjects and controls from 1994. The algorithm development process used both clinical insight and logistic regression methods.

Data extraction: Training set: Claims from 7,700 SEER-Medicare breast cancer subjects diagnosed in 1995, and 124,884 controls. Validation set: Claims from 7,607 SEER-Medicare breast cancer subjects diagnosed in 1994, and 120,317 controls.

Principal findings: A four-step prediction algorithm was developed and validated. It has a positive predictive value of 89 to 93 percent, and a sensitivity of 80 percent for identifying incident breast cancer. The sensitivity is 82-87 percent for stage I or II, and lower for other stages. The sensitivity is 82-83 percent for women who underwent either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, and is similar across geographic sites. A cohort identified with this algorithm will have 89-93 percent incident breast cancer cases, 1.5-6 percent cancer-free cases, and 4-5 percent prevalent breast cancer cases.

Conclusions: This algorithm has better performance characteristics than previously proposed algorithms. The ability to examine national patterns of breast cancer care using Medicare claims data would open new avenues for the assessment of quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic Representation of a Four-Step Algorithm for Identifying Incident Breast Cancer Cases from Medicare Claims The initial cohort on which the algorithm operates is comprised of women aged 65 and older on January 1 of the index year, who are alive and eligible for Medicare parts A and B, and not in an HMO, from January 1 of the index year through March 31 of the following year. Further details of each step are provided in the text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cooper G S, Yuan Z, Stange K C, Dennis L K, Amini S B, Rimm A A. “Agreement of Medicare and Tumor Registry Data for Assessment of Cancer-Related Treatment.”. Medical Care. 2000;38(4):411–21. - PubMed
    1. Cooper G S, Yuan Z, Stange K C, Dennis L K, Amini S B, Rimm A A. “The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers.”. Medical Care. 1999;37(5):436–44. - PubMed
    1. Fieller E C. “The Biological Standardization of Insulin.”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1940;7(supplement):1–64.
    1. Freeman J, Zhang D, Freeman D, Goodwin J. “An Approach to Identifying Incident Breast Cancer Cases Using Medicare Claims Data.”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53(6):605–14. - PubMed
    1. Gilligan M A, Kneusel R T, Hoffmann R G, Greer A L, Nattinger A B. “Persistent Differences in Sociodemographic Determinants of Breast Conserving Treatment Despite Overall Increased Adoption.”. Medical Care. 2002;40(3):181–9. - PubMed

Publication types