Cannulation of a resistant internal os with the malleable outer sheath of a coaxial soft embryo transfer catheter does not affect in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome
- PMID: 15533367
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.044
Cannulation of a resistant internal os with the malleable outer sheath of a coaxial soft embryo transfer catheter does not affect in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of cannulation of a resistant cervical os with the outer malleable sheath of a double-lumen, soft ET catheter on IVF-ET outcomes.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: University-based IVF center.
Patient(s): One hundred forty-two patients undergoing 142 ETs.
Intervention(s): Trial ultrasound-guided ET at all transfers, leaving the malleable outer sheath in situ when the soft inner catheter could not negotiate the internal os.
Main outcome measure(s): Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate.
Result(s): In 102 ETs (71.8%), the soft inner sheath easily negotiated the internal os (group 1). Forty ETs (28.2%) required cannulation of resistant internal ora with the outer sheath of the trial catheter (group 2). Implantation rates (35% vs. 32% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rates (50% vs. 45%) were not significantly different between groups. Blood was present on the transfer catheter after ET more frequently in group 2 than in group 1 (55% vs. 15%); however, neither the implantation rate nor the clinical pregnancy rate were affected by the presence of blood.
Conclusion(s): Cannulation of a resistant internal os by the malleable outer sheath and blood on the transfer catheter after ET do not have an adverse effect on implantation rate or clinical pregnancy rate.
Similar articles
-
Effect of macroscopic or microscopic blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers.Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):570-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 23. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19108824
-
Treatment with piroxicam before embryo transfer increases the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.Fertil Steril. 2004 Oct;82(4):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.140. Fertil Steril. 2004. PMID: 15482753 Clinical Trial.
-
Embryo transfer using the SureView catheter-beacon in the womb.Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.090. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19268930 Clinical Trial.
-
[Impact of embryo transfer techniques on implantation rates].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Feb;33(1 Pt 2):S36-9. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96403-4. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004. PMID: 14968044 Review. French.
-
[Difficult embryo transfer: what can be done in practice?].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003 Feb;31(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/s1297-9589(03)00012-2. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003. PMID: 12718992 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Use of Versapoint to refashion the cervical canal to overcome unusually difficult embryo transfers and improve in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: A case series.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):12-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82353. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011. PMID: 21772733 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted reproduction outcomes after embryo transfers requiring a malleable stylet.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Jul;29(7):585-8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9743-9. Epub 2012 Mar 20. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012. PMID: 22430391 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources