Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov 23;101(47):16437-41.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407663101. Epub 2004 Nov 8.

Remote hot spots mediate protein substrate recognition for the Cdc25 phosphatase

Affiliations

Remote hot spots mediate protein substrate recognition for the Cdc25 phosphatase

J Sohn et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Cdc25B is a phosphatase that catalyzes the dephosphorylation and activation of the cyclin-dependent kinases, thus driving cell cycle progression. We have identified two residues, R488 and Y497, located >20 A from the active site, that mediate protein substrate recognition without affecting activity toward small-molecule substrates. Injection of Cdc25B wild-type but not the R488L or Y497A variants induces germinal vesicle breakdown and cyclin-dependent kinase activation in Xenopus oocytes. The conditional knockout of the cdc25 homolog (mih1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be complemented by the wild type but not by the hot spot variants, indicating that protein substrate recognition by the Cdc25 phosphatases is an essential and evolutionarily conserved feature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Surface of Cdc25B showing the mutations. The image was generated with visual molecular dynamics (28).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Activity of Cdc25B mutants with pNPP, mFP, and protein substrate. Kinetic data for mutants of Cdc25B are shown as kcat, kcat/Km, and Cdk2-pTpY/CycA substrate (kcat/Km) as normalized by activity with pNPP (kcat/Km).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Km determination of Cdk2-pTpY/CycA for Cdc25B. The wild-type protein (open squares) yielded a Km of 440 ± 80 nM, whereas both hot spot mutants, Y497A (open triangles) and R488L (filled circles), were linear up to the highest achievable concentration, as seen in Inset. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Inhibition kinetics of catalytically inactive Cdc25B mutants. Activity of wild-type Cdc25B (3 nM) against Cdk2-pTpY/CycA (70 nM) was measured in the presence of varying concentrations (0.01–30 μM) of the catalytically inactive Cdc25B constructs [C473S (filled circles), C473D (filled squares), C473D-Y497A (open triangles), and C473S-Y497A (open circles)]. The percent activity observed at each given competitor concentration was fitted to percent activity = 100/(1 + [I]/IC50) where [I] is the concentration of inhibitor and IC50 values were calculated [C473S, 70 nM (apparent); C473D, 2.5 ± 0.5 μM; C473D/Y497A and C473S/Y497A, >150 μM). The data shown are mean values of at least three separate experiments.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Induction of GVBD and activation of Cdc2-histone kinase activity in Xenopus oocytes. (A) Cdc25 (1 μM final) was injected in stage-VI oocytes (14–18 replicates per enzyme form), and GVBD was monitored by visual inspection. (B) Histone kinase activity was tested from one to two pooled oocytes. (C) The presence of Cdc25B was demonstrated by Western blotting from six pooled oocytes.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Hot spot mutants do not rescue conditional mih1 yeast deletion strain. Yeast strain JMY1290 (hsl7Δ GAL-MIH1 leu2) transformed with a vector containing myc-tagged mih1 wild type, R488L, Y497A, or empty vector control as grown in media containing glucose (Upper) or galactose (Lower). Note the elongated, nondividing phenotype in the strains that do not express functional Mih1 (Cdc25). (B) Western blot demonstrating expression of Mih1 by means of the C-terminal Myc tag in all but the control strain.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bogan, A. A. & Thorn, K. S. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 280, 1–9. - PubMed
    1. Clackson, T. & Wells, J. A. (1995) Science 267, 383–386. - PubMed
    1. Schreiber, S. & Fersht, A. R. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 248, 478–486. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson, I. & Hoffmann, I. (2000) Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 4, 107–114. - PubMed
    1. Kristjánsdóttir, K. & Rudolph, J. (2004) Chem. Biol. 11, 1043–1051. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms