Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Autumn;6(3):191-4.

Influence of load cycling and tubule orientation on ultimate tensile strength of dentin

Ana Karina B Bedran-de-Castro  1 , Patricia N R Pereira, Jeffrey Y Thompson
Affiliations
  • PMID: 15536848

Influence of load cycling and tubule orientation on ultimate tensile strength of dentin

Ana Karina B Bedran-de-Castro et al. J Adhes Dent. 2004 Autumn.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical load cycling and tubule orientation on the ultimate tensile strength of crown and root dentin.

Materials and methods: Twenty bovine teeth were cleaned and their incisal surfaces reduced, resulting in a flat surface 4 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were divided into 4 groups: G1 = control (no mechanical load cycling); G2 = 1,000,000 load cycles at 50 N; G3 = 1,000,000 load cycles at 100 N; G4 = 1,000,000 load cycles at 200 N. Sections of 0.5+/-0.1 mm thick were cut mesiodistally and the slabs further trimmed to 0.5+/-0.1 mm in an hourglass shape, according to the tubule orientation (parallel and/or perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth) in the root and crown, with a fine diamond bur to produce a cross-sectional surface area of 0.25 mm2. All specimens were then subjected to ultimate tensile strength testing at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Means and standard deviations were expressed in MPa. The bond strength data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test (p < 0.05).

Results: Ultimate tensile strength values did not differ statistically significantly between the loaded group and the control. However, statistical differences existed between root and coronal dentin (p < 0.001) and between parallel and perpendicular orientation of tubules (p < 0.001), where root and sections parallel to the tubules presented higher values than coronal and perpendicular, respectively. These differences were not related to mechanical loading.

Conclusion: There was no effect of in vitro load cycling on ultimate tensile strength of dentin. Differences presented between ultimate tensile strength of crown vs root dentin and parallel vs perpendicular to the tubule orientation can be influenced by differences in the amount of organic and inorganic content as well as composition of the dentin matrix. It is important to consider these aspects when predicting the quality and durability of restorations according to the types of dentin and tubule orientation to be restored.

PubMed Disclaimer