Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities
- PMID: 15536855
Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities
Abstract
Purpose: Using extended, standardized MOD preparations, it was the aim of this in vitro study to examine the performance of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays in comparison to composite inlays after mechanical and thermal fatigue loading in terms of marginal quality and stabilization of the remaining tooth structure.
Materials and methods: Standardized cavities with different wall thicknesses were prepared in 90 extracted premolars; 10 additional premolars remained untreated. Composite inlays (Tetric) and CAD/CAM restorations (Cerec II; Vita Mark II) were adhesively placed in the cavities. After loading in a chewing simulator, quantitative and qualitative marginal gap examinations were conducted and fracture resistance determined.
Results: The results show that ceramic inlays provide significantly greater stabilization and better marginal quality than do composite inlays.
Conclusion: Chairside-fabricated ceramic inlays inserted using adhesive technology are able to stabilize weakened cusps. In the case of very thin remaining walls (about 1.3 mm), however, the marginal quality and the cusp-stabilizing effect are also reduced.
Similar articles
-
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.004. J Prosthet Dent. 2005. PMID: 16198171
-
Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0076-x. Epub 2006 Oct 10. Clin Oral Investig. 2007. PMID: 17031673
-
Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.Dent Mater. 2016 Feb;32(2):e22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 24. Dent Mater. 2016. PMID: 26723841
-
Potential role of CAD/CAM for posterior porcelain restorations.J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(6):282-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00870.x. J Esthet Dent. 1994. PMID: 8593225 Review. No abstract available.
-
Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic?Br Dent J. 1994 Jan 22;176(2):53-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808363. Br Dent J. 1994. PMID: 8117475 Review.
Cited by
-
Laboratory methods to simulate the mechanical degradation of resin composite restorations.Dent Mater. 2022 Jan;38(1):214-229. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 20. Dent Mater. 2022. PMID: 34949477 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Time Efficiency of Digitally and Conventionally Produced Single-Unit Restorations.Dent J (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;9(6):62. doi: 10.3390/dj9060062. Dent J (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34205956 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):177-83. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0677-5. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 22358378
-
In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Dec;19(9):2167-77. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2015. PMID: 25877233
-
Marginal quality of ceramic inlays after three different instrumental cavity preparation methods of the proximal boxes.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):793-803. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2492-0. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29862414 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous