Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Nov;6(11 Suppl 3):8-12.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.04237.x.

Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria

Douglas E Busby et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Nov.

Abstract

There are a variety of methods for assessing urinary albumin excretion, extending from the very low-range microalbuminuria to higher ranges extending into macroalbuminuria or proteinuria. The recommendation for the initial screening of a new patient is to use a urine dipstick to assess for microalbuminuria. If positive, a spot urine for albumin:creatinine should be measured and reassessed annually. All patients with kidney disease, diabetes, or hypertension and metabolic syndrome should be screened for albuminuria. New methodologies using high-performance liquid chromatography are much more sensitive and specific when compared with older methods of detection and may prove very useful for earlier identification of high-risk patients. This is important since studies have shown that albuminuria levels below the microalbuminuria range, determined by conventional methodologies in uncomplicated essential hypertensive men, are associated with an adverse cardiovascular and metabolic risk profile. High performance liquid chromatography methodology, in contrast to older studies, detects all intact albumin and enables clinicians to assess disease severity and monitor therapeutic effectiveness with confidence in the accuracy of the microalbuminuria data reported to them.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parsons M, Newman DJ, Pugia M, et al. performance of a reagent strip device for quantitation of the urine albumin: creatinine ratio in a point of care setting. Clin Nephrol. 1999;51:220–227. - PubMed
    1. Meinhardt U, Ammann RA, Fluck C, et al. Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus: efficacy of a new screening method in comparison with timed overnight urine collection. J Diabetes Complications. 2003;17:254–257. - PubMed
    1. Le Floch JP, Marre M, Rodier M, et al. Interest of Clinitek Microalbumin in screening for microalbuminuria: results of a multicenter study in 302 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 2001;27:36–39. - PubMed
    1. Mogensen CE, Viberti GC, Peheim E, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Micral‐Test II test strip, an immunologic rapid test for the detection of microalbuminuria. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1642–1646. - PubMed
    1. Gilbert RE, Akdeniz A, Jerums G. Detection of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients by urinary dipstick. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;35:57–60. - PubMed