Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;7(4):317-26.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00296.x.

How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?

Nancy Kraetschmer  1 , Natasha Sharpe, Sara Urowitz, Raisa B Deber
Affiliations

How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?

Nancy Kraetschmer et al. Health Expect. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Does trust in physicians aid or hinder patient autonomy? We examine the relationship between trust in the recipient's doctor, and desire for a participative role in decisions about medical treatment.

Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in an urban Canadian teaching hospital.

Setting and participants: A total of 606 respondents in three clinics (breast cancer, prostate cancer, fracture) completed questionnaires.

Variables studied: The instrument included the Problem Solving Decision Making (PSDM) Scale, which used two vignettes (current health condition, chest pain) to categorize respondents by preferred role, and the Trust-in-Physician Scale.

Results: Few respondents preferred an autonomous role (2.9% for the current health condition vignette and 1.2% for the chest pain vignette); most preferred shared decision-making (DM) (67.3% current health condition; 48.7% chest pain) or a passive role (29.6% current health condition; 50.1% chest pain). Trust-in-physician yielded 6.3% with blind trust, 36.1% with high trust, 48.6% moderate trust and 9.0% low trust. As hypothesized, autonomous patients had relatively low levels of trust, passive respondents were more likely to have blind trust, while shared respondents had high but not excessive trust. Trust had a significant influence on preferred role even after controlling for the demographic factors such as sex, age and education.

Conclusions: Very few respondents wish an autonomous role; those who do tend to have lower trust in their providers. Familiarity with a clinical condition increases desire for a shared (as opposed to passive) role. Shared DM often accompanies, and may require, a trusting patient-physician relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Categorization of preferred roles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred role by Trust: current health vignette.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preferred role by Trust: chest pain vignette.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trust by preferred role: current health vignette.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Trust by preferred role: chest pain vignette.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. President's Commission . President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making Health Care Decisions: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient‐Practitioner Relationship, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1982.
    1. Katz J. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: Free Press, 1984.
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
    1. Kassirer JP. Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 1994; 330: 1895–1896. - PubMed
    1. Pellegrino ED. Patient and physician autonomy: conflicting rights and obligations in the physician–patient relationship. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 1994; 10: 47–68. - PubMed

Publication types