Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Dec;7(4):327-37.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00297.x.

A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation -- impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation -- impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs

Sirkku Vuorma et al. Health Expect. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a decision aid for menorrhagia on treatment outcomes and costs over a 12-month follow-up.

Design: Randomized trial and pre-trial prospective cohort study.

Setting and participants: Gynaecology outpatient clinics in 14 Finnish hospitals, 363 (randomized trial) plus 206 (cohort study) patients with menorrhagia.

Intervention: A decision aid booklet explaining menorrhagia and treatment options, mailed to patients before their first clinic appointment.

Main outcome measures: Health related quality of life, psychological well-being, menstrual symptoms, satisfaction with treatment outcome, use and cost of health care services.

Results: All study groups experienced overall improvement in health-related quality of life, anxiety, and psychosomatic and menstrual symptoms, but not in sexual life. Treatment in the intervention group was more active than in the control group, with more frequent course of medication and less undecided treatments. However, there were no marked disparities in health outcomes, satisfaction with treatment outcome and costs. Total costs (including productivity loss) per woman because of menorrhagia over the 12-month follow-up were 2760 and 3094 in the intervention and control group, respectively (P = 0.1). The pre-trial group also had a significantly lower rate of uterus saving surgery compared with the control group, but no difference in costs because of menorrhagia treatment.

Conclusion: Despite some differences in treatment courses, a decision aid for menorrhagia in booklet form did not increase the use of health services or treatment costs, nor had it impact on health outcomes or satisfaction with outcome of treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile.

References

    1. Molenaar S, Sprangers MAG, Postma‐Schuit FCE, Rutgers EJT, Noorlander J, Hendriks J, et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 2000; 20: 112–127. - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003; 2: CD001431. - PubMed
    1. Kennedy ADM, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs. JAMA, 2002; 288: 2701–2708. - PubMed
    1. Murray E, Davis H, Tai SS, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care. British Medical Journal, 2001; 323: 490–493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray E, Davis H, Tai SS, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. British Medical Journal, 2001; 323: 493–496. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types