Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material
- PMID: 1554592
Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material
Abstract
Universal use of low-osmolality contrast agents for intravascular diagnostic procedures has been limited to a large extent by the high cost of these agents, which is generally 10 to 20 times that of high-osmolality contrast media. The question for the radiologist, therefore, is the definition of selected populations and situations for the use of low-osmolality agents to achieve the greatest patient benefit at the least cost. The authors examine controversial issues including the incidence of significant contrast reactions, the definition and incidence of nephrotoxicity, and the effects of contrast media on coagulability.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.Clin Pharm. 1986 Nov;5(11):877-91. Clin Pharm. 1986. PMID: 3780159
-
Nephrotoxicity of low osmolality contrast media versus high osmolality media.Invest Radiol. 1991 Nov;26 Suppl 1:S86; discussion S88-91. Invest Radiol. 1991. PMID: 1808157 No abstract available.
-
Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Mar;49(3):577-84. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992. PMID: 1598930
-
[Renal tolerance of iodinated low osmolality contrast agents. Clinical and experimental aspects].J Radiol. 1990 Jun-Jul;71(6-7):439-44. J Radiol. 1990. PMID: 2254874 Review. French.
-
Low-osmolality contrast media and the risk of contrast-associated nephrotoxicity.Invest Radiol. 1993 Nov;28 Suppl 5:S7-10; discussion S11-2. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199311001-00003. Invest Radiol. 1993. PMID: 8282507 Review.