Assessment of adverse events associated with triptans--methods of assessment influence the results
- PMID: 15546260
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04191.x
Assessment of adverse events associated with triptans--methods of assessment influence the results
Abstract
Background: A recent study conducted in triptan-naive migraine patients showed that tolerability was the second most important attribute of an acute treatment. However, the proportion of patients reporting side effects after any acute treatment may vary with regard to the method of assessment.
Objectives: To contrast two methods of assessing adverse events (prompted and unprompted) in those with headache using triptans.
Methods: This study was conducted in two sites, a headache center in the United States, and a neurology office focusing on headache in Italy. We prospectively surveyed 415 adults with headache, who had been using the same triptan for at least 3 months. Participants were asked about their headache and treatment history. Subjects then completed a standardized questionnaire, assessing adverse events in two different ways. First, subjects were asked if they had any adverse events when using the triptan. After returning the first part of the questionnaire, subjects received a second form, where 49 possible adverse events were listed. We contrasted and correlated both sets of answers.
Results: Most patients (U.S.=74.9%, Italy=65.5%) reported no side effects in the unprompted questionnaire. However, most of them (U.S.=62.9%, Italy=54.1%) reported at least one side effect in the prompted questionnaire. Most patients that reported side effects in the unprompted questionnaire said they had just one adverse event, while most reported two or more side effects in the prompted questionnaire. Both in the unprompted and in the prompted questionnaires, most side effects were rated as mild or moderate. Interestingly, 31 (7.5%) subjects (pooling data from both sites together) graded their adverse events as severe in the prompted questionnaire, but had not self-reported them.
Conclusions: (1) When assessing adverse events, the method of data collection may dramatically influence the results. (2) From those subjects who did not self-report adverse events after using a triptan, most of them will report positively if presented with a list of side effects.
Similar articles
-
Tolerability of acute migraine medications: influence of methods of assessment and relationship with headache attributes.Cephalalgia. 2008 Oct;28(10):1012-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01643.x. Epub 2008 Aug 22. Cephalalgia. 2008. PMID: 18727650
-
How treatment priorities influence triptan preferences in clinical practice: perspectives of migraine sufferers, neurologists, and primary care physicians.Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Mar;21(3):413-24. doi: 10.1185/030079905X36387. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005. PMID: 15811210
-
Priorities for triptan treatment attributes and the implications for selecting an oral triptan for acute migraine: a study of US primary care physicians (the TRIPSTAR Project).Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1533-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.011. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15531016
-
Review of clinical trials using early acute intervention with oral triptans for migraine management.Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Jun;60(6):698-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00981.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 16805756 Review.
-
Cardiovascular tolerability and safety of triptans: a review of clinical data.Headache. 2004 May;44 Suppl 1:S20-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04105.x. Headache. 2004. PMID: 15149490 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Initial Validation of a Patient-Reported Adverse Drug Event Questionnaire.Drug Saf. 2013 Sep;36(9):765-77. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0036-8. Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 23553447 Clinical Trial.
-
Nonspecific adverse events in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: a systematic review.PLoS One. 2014 Nov 3;9(11):e111776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111776. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25365336 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET).J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:615-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.120. Epub 2020 Jan 25. J Affect Disord. 2020. PMID: 32056935 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
The psychedelic afterglow phenomenon: a systematic review of subacute effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics.Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023 May 29;13:20451253231172254. doi: 10.1177/20451253231172254. eCollection 2023. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37284524 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical