Similar articles

• A critique of the false-positive report probability.

  Lucke JF. Lucke JF. Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;33(2):145-50. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20363. Genet Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 18720477
• Gene-environment interactions: how many false positives?

  Matullo G, Berwick M, Vineis P. Matullo G, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Apr 20;97(8):550-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji122. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15840871 No abstract available.
• Selection of influential genetic markers among a large number of candidates based on effect estimation rather than hypothesis testing: an approach for genome-wide association studies.

  Strömberg U, Björk J, Broberg K, Mertens F, Vineis P. Strömberg U, et al. Epidemiology. 2008 Mar;19(2):302-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181632c3d. Epidemiology. 2008. PMID: 18300718
• Biostatistics and epidemiology: measuring the risk attributable to an environmental or genetic factor.

  Benichou J. Benichou J. C R Biol. 2007 Apr;330(4):281-98. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.02.015. Epub 2007 Apr 12. C R Biol. 2007. PMID: 17502285 Review.
• The dangers of false-positive and false-negative test results: false-positive results as a function of pretest probability.

  Jackson BR. Jackson BR. Clin Lab Med. 2008 Jun;28(2):305-19, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2007.12.009. Clin Lab Med. 2008. PMID: 18436073 Review.