Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast-conserving cancer treatment--objective quantitative assessment
- PMID: 1554891
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01834638
Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast-conserving cancer treatment--objective quantitative assessment
Abstract
A battery of objective measurements of cosmetic outcome was performed on 114 patients who had been treated by breast-preservation techniques for breast cancer. Cosmetic breast retraction, as determined by Breast Retraction Assessment (BRA) measurements, was significantly greater in patients who underwent extensive primary tumor resection, were more than 60 years old, weighed more than 150 lbs, or had a primary tumor in an upper breast quadrant. While use of a local RT boost, per se, was not a significant factor, those patients with high dose and/or large volume local boosts more frequently had marked retraction. Breast telangiectasia and depigmentation (T/D) was related to use of a local RT boost, patient age greater than 60 years, and use of separate nodal RT fields. Breast T/D was significantly more frequent with use of electron beam local RT boost which delivered a boost skin dose exceeding 1600 cGy. Objective quantitative assessments, such as BRA and T/D area measurements, provide data to determine factors related to each type of cosmetic change and thus provide guidelines for optimizing cosmetic outcome. Limiting the extent of primary tumor resection may minimize the amount of breast retraction. Omitting the local RT boost, particularly large volume, high dose boosts, may reduce the frequency of marked cosmetic retraction and skin T/D.
Similar articles
-
A cosmetic evaluation of breast cancer treatment: a randomized study of radiotherapy boost technique.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.039. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 16029782 Clinical Trial.
-
Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Mar;11(3):575-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90190-7. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985. PMID: 3972667
-
Combined chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer: updated results in a series of 120 patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 15;59(4):1062-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.034. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 15234040
-
Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S115-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.022. Breast. 2013. PMID: 24074771 Review.
-
Techniques of tumour bed boost irradiation in breast conserving therapy: current evidence and suggested guidelines.Acta Oncol. 2007;46(7):879-92. doi: 10.1080/02841860701441798. Acta Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17851869 Review.
Cited by
-
Breast conservation therapy: local tumor control in patients with pathologically clear margins who receive 5000 cGy breast irradiation without local boost.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994;32(3):261-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00666003. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994. PMID: 7865854
-
Endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer.World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0202-y. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16555026
-
Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.Ann Surg Oncol. 1995 Jul;2(4):303-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02307061. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7552618
-
Immediate breast reconstruction using autologous free dermal fat grafts provides better cosmetic results for patients with upper inner cancerous lesions.Surg Today. 2011 Apr;41(4):477-89. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4307-z. Epub 2011 Mar 23. Surg Today. 2011. PMID: 21431479
-
Cosmetic outcome of breast conservative treatment for early stage breast cancer.Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 May;8(5):334-8. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0179-5. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16760008
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical